Cited by 69Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesOnline and Blended LearningHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

Predictors of teacher satisfaction with online professional development: evidence from the USA’s e‐Learning for Educators initiative

Reeves, Todd D., Pedulla, Joseph J.·2011·Professional Development in Education

Abstract

Online professional development (OPD) is proliferating in an effort to eliminate barriers to high‐quality in‐service teacher training. Using the Internet as a vehicle for continuing professional development, however, introduces new concerns largely absent in its face‐to‐face counterpart. For example, evidence from the USA’s e‐Learning for Educators (EfE) initiative suggests that some OPD participants do not complete the online courses in which they enrol. In response to this evidence, the present study (N = 3998) investigates factors associated with teacher satisfaction with OPD via secondary analysis of EfE evaluation data. After considering participant variables, factors examined previously in the e‐learning and professional development satisfaction literatures as well as novel predictors, a blockwise ordinary least squares regression model explains a considerably large share of the variance in participants’ satisfaction with OPD (48.1%). Implications for the design and implementation of OPD and the training of facilitators to increase satisfaction are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19415257.2011.553824

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effective learning occurred when the student was dedicated, prepared, self-motivated, had good support, and provided relevant comments that increased participation and quality interaction.

    “Effective learning occurred when the student was dedicated, prepared, self-motivated, had good support (Muir et al. 2019), and provided relevant comments that increased participation and quality interaction (Reeves. and Pedulla 2011;Tang and Lam 2014).”

Authors
Reeves, T. D., & Pedulla, J. J.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Reeves, Todd D.
Venue
Professional Development in Education
Published
2011-09
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
591-611
ISSN
  • 1941-5257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-5265
OpenAlex
W1982972873
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Professional Development in Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Boston College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Keywords
online professional development, teacher job satisfaction, continuing teacher education, course completion, online course design, facilitator training, predictors of satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review