Cited by 131Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsTeacher Education and Assessments

Teacher professional learning under audit: reconfiguring practice in an age of standards

Mockler, Nicole·2022·Professional Development in Education

Abstract

One of the key tenets of the global education reform movement, professional standards for teachers have reshaped different aspects of teachers’ work and learning in many contexts internationally over the past two decades. This paper explores the consequences of neoliberalism for teacher professional learning in contemporary times. The policies and processes built up around teacher professional development and learning as a consequence of contemporary regimes of standards and their dominant conceptualisation of teacher professionalism, constitute particular cultural-discursive, material-economic and social-political arrangements that frame the practice of teacher professional learning. These in turn give rise to some possibilities of practice while limiting others, effectively creating the space within which what counts as 'authentic professional learning' can be enacted. A case study of the interplay between professional standards and professional learning in the jurisdiction of New South Wales, Australia, is presented, via an analysis of publicly available texts generated by the NSW Education Standards Authority explicitly related to teacher professional learning and development. The paper argues that the practice architectures of professional learning in an age of standards work to support instrumental forms of professional learning while constraining the possibility of more authentic or generative forms of professional learning and consequently, teacher professionalism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19415257.2020.1720779

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 44 · Cited by 131

Authors
Mockler, N.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Mockler, Nicole
Venue
Professional Development in Education
Published
2020-01-30
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
166-180
ISSN
  • 1941-5257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-5265
OpenAlex
W3003565943
Cited by
131
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
FWCI
21.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Professional Development in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
teacher learning, teacher professional standards, neoliberalism, teacher professionalism, teacher professional development, educational reform, practice architectures, New South Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review