Cited by 15Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducational Leadership and PracticesSchool Leadership and Teacher Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Headteachers and the pandemic: Themes from a review of literature on leadership for professional learning in complex times

Open access
Torrance, Deirdre, Mifsud, Denise, Niesche, Richard, Fertig, Michael·2023·Professional Development in Education

Abstract

This paper draws from a review of the global literature on school leadership during the first 30 months of the pandemic (2020–2022), when educational leaders were faced with complexity on an unprecedented scale. COVID-19 challenged school leadership, providing opportunities to reflect on: leadership practice within and beyond school contexts; building relationships with wider communities and external stakeholders; established bureaucratic systems and ways of working (Author et al. under review). School leaders’ reliance on organisational stability, hierarchy and standardised practice was also challenged: reflective practice was needed, whilst responding to complex and demanding situations. Increased teacher autonomy and agency was encouraged and embraced, with ‘profound collaboration borne out of necessity and urgency’ (p. 393), highlighting the fluid practice of leadership rather than the role specificities of a leader. As school systems return to the business of in-person schooling and further away from the shock of the pandemic, the article renews calls to learn from experience and innovation. Three aspects are discussed, for supporting the development of school leadership/leaders capable of navigating complexity: school leadership; informal professional learning; formal professional learning. Our analysis provides insights into advancing professional learning approaches: accounting for complexity; enhancing teaching and learning; strengthening educator empowerment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19415257.2023.2229333

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1080/0305764X.2022.2159013 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101928 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/23328584221096465 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/00220620.2021.1957793 · DOI
  6. 10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0019 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/14782103211021937 · DOI
  8. 10.32674/jsard.v5iS1.2781 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/13678868.2022.2073119 · DOI
  10. 10.1108/JEA-01-2019-0004 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/12294659.2013.10805241 · DOI
  12. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., and Sutton, A. 2012. Systematic approaches to successful literature review. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  13. 10.1080/02680939.2022.2097316 · DOI
  14. 10.5040/9781350159662 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100146 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/19415257.2021.1973070 · DOI
  17. 10.1108/JPCC-07-2020-0055 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/capr.12165 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/13632434.2010.485182 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/00220574211032588 · DOI
  21. 10.55354/2692-3394.1025 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/14752409211034399 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/23328584221078328 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/13632434.2010.540559 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/00220620.2013.768971 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/03004279.2021.1988674 · DOI
  27. 10.2139/ssrn.3642919 · DOI
  28. 10.4018/978-1-6684-4331-6.ch011 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/15700763.2022.2052907 · DOI
  30. 10.32674/jsard.v7i2.3838 · DOI
  31. Greany, T., et al., 2021. Leading in lockdown: research on school leaders’ work, wellbeing and career intentions. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. https://file:/Users/deirdre/Downloads/LeadinginLockdownFinalReport.pdf.
  32. 10.1177/1741143216659296 · DOI
  33. Gurr, D. and Drysdale, L., 2020a. Leadership for challenging times. International Studies in Educational Administration, 48 (1), 24–30.
  34. Gurr, D. and Drysdale, L., 2020b. Leadership for challenging times: lessons from the past and capabilities for the future. Australian Educational Leader, 42 (3), 28–31.
  35. 10.1108/09578231311304670 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/13632434.2022.2064626 · DOI
  37. 10.36421/veritas.v19i2.407 · DOI
  38. 10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0038 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/15700763.2021.1917623 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/15582159.2022.2164153 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/13603124.2020.1862920 · DOI
  42. Jones, M.A., et al., 2021. Crisis as opportunity: experiences of Norwegian school leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education in the North, 28 (3), 274–292.
  43. Kafa, A., 2021. Advancing school leadership in times of uncertainty: the case of the global pandemic crisis. Leading & Managing, 27 (1), 37–50.
  44. 10.1108/JME-08-2021-0151 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/00313831.2022.2043430 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/17411432211027634 · DOI
  47. 10.4467/25439561LE.21.006.15360 · DOI
  48. Mifsud D. et al . 2021. School leadership in the pandemic: a literature review of research trends purposes and emerging concepts in the global education response to COVID-19.
  49. Naseem, A., et al., 2022. School teachers and principals’ experiences during COVID-19 in Pakistan. Journal of liberal arts and human sciences, 1 (1), 32–45.
  50. 10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0017 · DOI
  51. 10.1080/13678868.2022.2072700 · DOI
  52. Okilwa, N.S.A. and Barnett, B.G., 2021. Strategies and practices of leading schools during the current Covid-19 crisis. International Studies in Educational Administration, 49 (3), 61–81.
  53. 10.1002/rev3.3095 · DOI
  54. 10.1080/13603124.2021.2014981 · DOI
  55. 10.1108/HE-02-2021-0027 · DOI
  56. 10.3389/feduc.2021.617875 · DOI
  57. 10.3389/feduc.2020.618075 · DOI
  58. 10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0026 · DOI
  59. Schultz, S. and Love, K., 2022. How COVID-19 pandemic experiences can inform teacher education and professional development practices. Global Education Review, 9 (3), 38–57.
  60. 10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0020 · DOI
  61. 10.1080/13632434.2022.2045268 · DOI
  62. 10.1080/14494035.2019.1617971 · DOI
  63. 10.1080/07294360.2011.631515 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/joms.12696 · DOI
  65. UNESCO, 2020. Education in a post-Covid world. Nine ideas for public action. Paris: UNESCO.
  66. 10.1108/JEA-01-2022-0012 · DOI
  67. 10.1177/14782103221135620 · DOI
  68. White, S., et al., 2022. In-the-moment experiences of rural school principals in the COVID-19 pandemic. The Rural Educator, 43 (2), 47–59. · DOI
  69. 10.1596/33696 · DOI
  70. Yildaz Sal, S. and Gocen, A., 2022. Teachers’ views on leadership in the new normal. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17 (1), 1–16.
  71. 10.1093/polsoc/puab016 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Torrance, D., Mifsud, D., Niesche, R., & Fertig, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Torrance, Deirdre
Venue
Professional Development in Education
Published
2023-07-02
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
1103-1116
ISSN
  • 1941-5257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-5265
OpenAlex
W4382941081
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Professional Development in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
Keywords
school leadership, COVID-19 pandemic, school principals, professional learning, complexity, teacher autonomy, teacher agency, informal professional learning, teacher empowerment, reflective practice, collaboration, organizational stability, bureaucratic system, stakeholder relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review