The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Impossible Dream? Non-Binary People's Perceptions of Legal Gender Status and Reform in the UK
Open accessAbstract
The meaning and significance of gender is currently a focus of heated and, often, polarised debate in the UK and elsewhere. This article provides a new perspective in the gender debate through focused exploration of UK-based non-binary people’s perceptions of legal gender status and reform. Binary gender/sex systems, such as the legal gender system in the UK, are underpinned by cisgenderism and are challenged by those whose identity falls outside of the binary of woman and man. In contrast to most lay participants in the Future of Legal Gender (FLaG) project, the majority of non-binary participants reported support for reform (85.5% (n = 165) in favour) to the current UK legal gender system. Over half (57%, n = 110) were in favour of abolishing legal gender (i.e. the state would no longer assign a legal gender status), although this was constructed as ‘an impossible dream’. Situating non-binary people’s perspectives at the heart of the debate about the certification of gender offers novel insight which could have significant ramifications for how societal structures could support undoing gender in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“That 'non-binary' is not recognized as a legal gender category in law means that non-binary people are necessarily limited in the range of social settings in which their gender is adequately recognized (see Newman and Peel 2022 ).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Newman and Peel 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Hendricks, M. L., & Testa, R. J. (2012) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0029597 · Cited by 2,134
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1111/socf.12517 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315173061 · DOI
- 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 · DOI · Paper page
- Cooper D, 2019, feminists@law, 9
- Cooper D, 2020, feminists@law, 10
- Cooper D., 2020, Feminists@Law, 10
- Cooper D., 2020, Feminists@Law, 10
- 10.1111/jols.12000 · DOI
- Cover R, 2019, Emergent identities: New sexualities, genders and relationships in a digital era
- Ellis S. J., 2020, Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex and queer psychology: An introduction
- 10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0891243220965909 · DOI
- 10.1080/19419899.2017.1319408 · DOI
- 10.5040/9780755606672 · DOI
- 10.1177/1363460719888436 · DOI
- 10.1080/15532739.2018.1538841 · DOI
- Nordmarken S, 2019, Feminist Studies, 45, 36
- Peel E, 2021, Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review, 4, 2, 10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.2.2 · DOI
- Peel E., 2020, Feminists@Law, 10
- 10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_2 · DOI
- 10.1177/2329496515604644 · DOI
- Sumerau J. E., 2019, America through transgender eyes
- Vincent B, 2020, Non-binary genders: Navigating communities, identities, and healthcare
- 10.1177/0891243213503203 · DOI
- 10.1111/socf.12291 · DOI
- Zamantakis A, 2019, Expanding the rainbow: Exploring the relationships of Bi+, trans, ace, poly, kink, and intersex people, 293, 10.1163/9789004414105_023 · DOI
Cited by
Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power
Herissone-Kelly, R. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf044 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman, H. J. H., & Peel, E.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Peel, Elizabeth
- Venue
- Psychology & Sexuality
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-02-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1381-1395
- ISSN
- 1941-9899 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-9902
- OpenAlex
- W4210944060
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychology and Sexuality (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P008968/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Keywords
- non-binary people, gender identity, cisgenderism, gender binary, public attitudes, United Kingdom
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
