BioPhi: A platform for antibody design, humanization, and humanness evaluation based on natural antibody repertoires and deep learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Despite recent advances in transgenic animal models and display technologies, humanization of mouse sequences remains the primary route for therapeutic antibody development. Traditionally, humanization is manual, laborious, and requires expert knowledge. Although automation efforts are advancing, existing methods are either demonstrated on a small scale or are entirely proprietary. To predict the immunogenicity risk, the human-likeness of sequences can be evaluated using existing humanness scores, but these lack diversity, granularity or interpretability. Meanwhile, immune repertoire sequencing has generated rich antibody libraries such as the Observed Antibody Space (OAS) that offer augmented diversity not yet exploited for antibody engineering. Here we present BioPhi, an open-source platform featuring novel methods for humanization (Sapiens) and humanness evaluation (OASis). Sapiens is a deep learning humanization method trained on the OAS database using language modeling. Based on an in silico humanization benchmark of 177 antibodies, Sapiens produced sequences at scale while achieving results comparable to that of human experts. OASis is a granular, interpretable and diverse humanness score based on 9-mer peptide search in the OAS. OASis separated human and non-human sequences with high accuracy, and correlated with clinical immunogenicity. Together, BioPhi offers an antibody design interface with automated methods that capture the richness of natural antibody repertoires to produce therapeutics with desired properties and accelerate antibody discovery campaigns. BioPhi is accessible at https://biophi.dichlab.org and https://github.com/Merck/BioPhi .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Merck and the Bitton group trained a Transformer encoder-based language model called Sapiens to humanize sequences.
“Likewise, Merck® and the Bitton group trained a Transformer encoder-based language model called Sapiens to humanize sequences.”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
They provide an open-source platform, named BioPhi, incorporating the Transformer, and an evaluation method to aid antibody humanization.
“They provide an open-source platform, named BioPhi [33], incorporating the Transformer, and an evaluation method to aid antibody humanization.”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 190
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [19]Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Ł, Polosukhin I. Attention is all you need. In: advances in neural information processing systems. Vols. 2017-Decem. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation. 2017; 30: 5999– 6009.46.
- [35]Poiron C, Wu Y, Ginestoux C, Ehrenmann F, Duroux P, Lefranc M-P. IMGT/mAb-DB: the IMGT®database for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Journées Ouvertes de Biologie, Informatique et Mathématiques (JOBIM), Montpellier. 2010; 13: 11.37.
- Authors
- Prihoda, D., Maamary, J., Waight, A., Juan, V., Fayadat-Dilman, L., Svozil, D., & Bitton, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Informatics and Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
- Discovery Biologics, Protein Sciences, MRL, Merck & Co., Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Molecular Genetics (CZ)
- MSD (Czech Republic) (CZ)
- Corresponding author
- Bitton, Danny A.
- Venue
- mAbs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-02-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2020203-2020203
- ISSN
- 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-0870
- PMC
- PMC8837241
- OpenAlex
- W4220757565
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 21.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- mAbs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
- Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (LM2018130)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- antibody humanization, therapeutic antibody design, immunogenicity prediction, language modeling, antibody discovery
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Animals, Antibodies, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review