A high-throughput platform for biophysical antibody developability assessment to enable AI/ML model training
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Antibodies must bind their targets with high affinity and specificity to achieve useful therapeutic activity. They must also possess suitable developability properties (e.g., thermostability, solubility, viscosity, polyreactivity) to ensure favorable manufacturing, formulation, and in vivo performance. Both binding and developability properties are inherent to a given antibody amino acid sequence. Identification or selection of antibodies possessing suitable binding characteristics is now routine, and de novo computational design models, trained on extensive complementarity-determining region sequence and structural data, are rapidly improving. Developability properties, however, remain difficult to predict largely due to insufficient training data, with empirical testing being heavily used to avoid challenges in late-stage antibody development. To fill this gap, we built a high-throughput antibody developability assay platform designed to generate the large datasets needed to train improved machine learning (ML) models. We optimized and automated known developability assays [Jain et al., 2017], and developed a robust integrated data analytics pipeline. Here we report data on 246 antibodies—representing 106 approved, 135 clinical-stage, and 5 preregistration/withdrawn molecules—across a panel of 10 developability assays, in a “tidy data” format suitable for AI/ML modeling. We used these data to develop an XGBoost [Chen et al., 2016] ML model that better predicts similarity to approved antibodies compared to conventional use of developability warning thresholds. Additionally, we confirm that preliminary predictive models do improve with more training data. Our high-throughput PROPHET-Ab platform enables data generation at the scale needed to develop improved ML models to predict antibody developability. Significance Successful antibody drugs exhibit important “developability” properties, beyond tight and specific binding to their target, including high expressibility, high stability and solubility, low aggregation propensity, low viscosity, low polyreactivity, and long in vivo half-life. Collectively, developability properties predict favorable manufacturing, storage, administration, and safety, and deficiencies in these properties increase risk for clinical failure. Despite progress in developing machine learning models to predict structure and binding, antibody developability models lag, largely due to a lack of sufficiently large training datasets. We have built a high-throughput platform, PROPHET-Ab, that enables data generation at the scale needed to train improved AI/ML models to predict antibody developability.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Morcos, F., Pagnani, A., Lunt, B., Bertolino, A., Marks, D. S., Sander, C., Zecchina, R., Onuchic, J. N., Hwa, T., & Weigt, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · Cited by 1,434 · see citing works
Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation
Marks, D. S., Colwell, L. J., Sheridan, R., Hopf, T. A., Pagnani, A., Zecchina, R., & Sander, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 · Cited by 1,144 · see citing works
Biophysical properties of the clinical-stage antibody landscape
Jain, T., Sun, T., Durand, S., Hall, A., Houston, N. R., Nett, J. H., Sharkey, B., Bobrowicz, B., Caffry, I., Yu, Y., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1616408114 · Cited by 629 · cited 10× · see citing works
“The weak correlation we observe with polyreactivity data of Jain et al. 1 and Shehata et al. 17 is likely due to significant differences in methodology and assay formats.”
InfluentialIgG Fc engineering to modulate antibody effector functions
Wang, X., Mathieu, M., & Brezski, R. J. (2018) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-017-0473-8 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Arsiwala, A., Bhatt, R., van Niekerk, L., Quintero-Cadena, P., Ao, X., Rosenbaum, A., Bhatt, A., Smith, A., Yang, Y., Anderson, K., Grippo, L., Cao, X., Cohen, R., Patel, J., Moller, J., Allen, O., Faraj, A., Nandy, A., Hocking, J., Ergun, A., Tural, B., Salvador, S., Jacobowitz, J., Schaven, K., Sherman, M., Shah, S., Tessier, P. M., & Borhani, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc. (United States) (US)
- Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
- Cypher Technologies Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
- AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Merida Biosciences, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Revolution Medicines (United States) (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arsiwala, Ammar
- Borhani, David W.
- ORCID
- Venue
- mAbs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-12-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2593055-2593055
- ISSN
- 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-0870
- OpenAlex
- W4416903466
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2026-09-12)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- mAbs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ginkgo Bioworks Inc.
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Keywords
- antibody developability, therapeutic antibodies, XGBoost, thermal stability, solubility, viscosity, polyreactivity, antibody engineering, training data generation
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, High-Throughput Screening Assays
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review