Cited by 16Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesProtein purification and stability

A high-throughput platform for biophysical antibody developability assessment to enable AI/ML model training

Open access
Arsiwala, Ammar, Bhatt, Rebecca, van Niekerk, Lood, Quintero-Cadena, Porfirio, Ao, Xiang, Rosenbaum, Adam, Bhatt, Aanal, Smith, Alexander +20 more·2025·mAbs

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Antibodies must bind their targets with high affinity and specificity to achieve useful therapeutic activity. They must also possess suitable developability properties (e.g., thermostability, solubility, viscosity, polyreactivity) to ensure favorable manufacturing, formulation, and in vivo performance. Both binding and developability properties are inherent to a given antibody amino acid sequence. Identification or selection of antibodies possessing suitable binding characteristics is now routine, and de novo computational design models, trained on extensive complementarity-determining region sequence and structural data, are rapidly improving. Developability properties, however, remain difficult to predict largely due to insufficient training data, with empirical testing being heavily used to avoid challenges in late-stage antibody development. To fill this gap, we built a high-throughput antibody developability assay platform designed to generate the large datasets needed to train improved machine learning (ML) models. We optimized and automated known developability assays [Jain et al., 2017], and developed a robust integrated data analytics pipeline. Here we report data on 246 antibodies—representing 106 approved, 135 clinical-stage, and 5 preregistration/withdrawn molecules—across a panel of 10 developability assays, in a “tidy data” format suitable for AI/ML modeling. We used these data to develop an XGBoost [Chen et al., 2016] ML model that better predicts similarity to approved antibodies compared to conventional use of developability warning thresholds. Additionally, we confirm that preliminary predictive models do improve with more training data. Our high-throughput PROPHET-Ab platform enables data generation at the scale needed to develop improved ML models to predict antibody developability. Significance Successful antibody drugs exhibit important “developability” properties, beyond tight and specific binding to their target, including high expressibility, high stability and solubility, low aggregation propensity, low viscosity, low polyreactivity, and long in vivo half-life. Collectively, developability properties predict favorable manufacturing, storage, administration, and safety, and deficiencies in these properties increase risk for clinical failure. Despite progress in developing machine learning models to predict structure and binding, antibody developability models lag, largely due to a lack of sufficiently large training datasets. We have built a high-throughput platform, PROPHET-Ab, that enables data generation at the scale needed to train improved AI/ML models to predict antibody developability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19420862.2025.2593055

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Arsiwala, A., Bhatt, R., van Niekerk, L., Quintero-Cadena, P., Ao, X., Rosenbaum, A., Bhatt, A., Smith, A., Yang, Y., Anderson, K., Grippo, L., Cao, X., Cohen, R., Patel, J., Moller, J., Allen, O., Faraj, A., Nandy, A., Hocking, J., Ergun, A., Tural, B., Salvador, S., Jacobowitz, J., Schaven, K., Sherman, M., Shah, S., Tessier, P. M., & Borhani, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc. (United States) (US)
  • Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
  • Cypher Technologies Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • Merida Biosciences, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • Revolution Medicines (United States) (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
  • Arsiwala, Ammar
  • Borhani, David W.
Venue
mAbs
Published
2025-12-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
2593055-2593055
ISSN
  • 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-0870
OpenAlex
W4416903466
Cited by
16
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 1
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mAbs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ginkgo Bioworks Inc.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
antibody developability, therapeutic antibodies, XGBoost, thermal stability, solubility, viscosity, polyreactivity, antibody engineering, training data generation
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review