Cited by 15Neural dynamics and brain functionIon channel regulation and functionNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

The century-old picture of a nerve spike is wrong: filaments fire, before membrane

Open access
Ghosh, Subrata, Singh, Pushpendra, Manna, Jhimli, Saxena, Komal, Sahoo, Pathik, Krishnanda, Soami Daya, Ray, Kanad, Hill, Jonathan P. +1 more·2022·Communicative & Integrative Biology

Abstract

In 1907, Lapicque proposed that an electric field passes through the neuronal membrane and transmits a signal. Subsequently, a "snake curve" or spike was used to depict the means by which a linear flat current undergoes a sudden Gaussian or Laplacian peak. This concept has been the accepted scenario for more than 115 years even appearing in textbooks on the subject. It was not noted that the membrane spike should have a cylindrical shape. A nerve spike having a dot shape on membrane surface cannot propagate through a cylindrical surface since it would dissipate instantaneously. A nerve spike should have the appearance of a ring, encompassing the diameter of a cylindrical axon or dendron. However, this subtle change has remarkable implications. Maintaining a circular form of an electric field is not easy, especially at the surface of an organic object. Here, we suggest that neuroscience could redefine itself if we accept that a nerve spike is not a localized 3D Gaussian or Laplacian wave packet, rather it is a 3D ring encompassing the diameter of a neural branch.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19420889.2022.2071101

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Bandyopadhyay group has adapted methods from solid-state physics and quantum optics to noninvasively target known resonances of the MTs in living networks of neurons.

    “Along these lines, the Bandyopadhyay group has adapted methods from solid-state physics and quantum optics to noninvasively target known resonances of the MTs in living networks of neurons (Singh et al., 2021a,b; Ghosh et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 15

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Bandyopadhyay A. Nanobrain: the making of an artificial brain from a time crystal: taylor & Francis Inc. Bosa Roca United States: Imprint CRC Press Inc; 2020. p. 1– 336.
  2. [13]Lapicque L. Recherches quantitatives sur l’excitation électrique des nerfs traitée comme une polarisation. J Physiol Pathol Gen. 1907; 9: 620– 635.

Authors
Ghosh, S., Singh, P., Manna, J., Saxena, K., Sahoo, P., Krishnanda, S. D., Ray, K., Hill, J. P., & Bandyopadhyay, A.
Affiliations
  • North East Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
  • Research Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (JP)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
  • Dayalbagh Educational Institute (IN)
  • Amity University Jaipur (IN)
Corresponding author
Bandyopadhyay, Anirban
Venue
Communicative & Integrative Biology
Published
2022-05-10
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
115-120
ISSN
1942-0889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280605391
Cited by
15
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communicative & Integrative Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • NIMS Materials Data Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development, [AOARD] (FA2386-16-1-0003 (2016–2019))
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
action potential, neuronal membrane, electric field, axons, dendrons, signal propagation, history of neuroscience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review