The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies to reduce mycotoxin levels in maize during storage: a review
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the main cereals as a source of food, forage and processed products for industry. World production is around 790 million tonnes of maize because as a staple food it provides more than one-third of the calories and proteins in some countries. Stored maize is a man-made ecosystem in which quality and nutritive changes occur because of interactions between physical, chemical and biological factors. Fungal spoilage and mycotoxin contamination are of major concern. Aspergillus and Fusarium species can infect maize pre-harvest, and mycotoxin contamination can increase if storage conditions are poorly managed. Prevention strategies to reduce the impact of mycotoxin in maize food and feed chains are based on using a hazard analysis critical control point systems (HACCP) approach. To reduce or prevent production of mycotoxins, drying should take place soon after harvest and as rapidly as feasible. The critical water content for safe storage corresponds to a water activity (a(w)) of about 0.7. Problems in maintaining an adequately low a(w) often occur in the tropics where high ambient humidity make the control of commodity moisture difficult. Damage grain is more prone to fungal invasion and, therefore, mycotoxin contamination. It is important to avoid damage before and during drying, and during storage. Drying maize on the cob before shelling is a very good practice. In storage, many insect species attack grain and the moisture that can accumulate from their activities provides ideal conditions for fungal activity. To avoid moisture and fungal contamination, it is essential that the numbers of insects in stored maize should be kept to a minimum. It is possible to control fungal growth in stored commodities by controlled atmospheres, preservatives or natural inhibitors. Studies using antioxidants, essential oils under different conditions of a(w), and temperature and controlled atmospheres have been evaluated as possible strategies for the reduction of fungal growth and mycotoxin (aflatoxins and fumonisins) in stored maize, but the cost of these treatments is likely to remain prohibitive for large-scale use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tripathi, P., & Dubey, N. K. (2004) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.11.005 · Cited by 786
Cited by
Global Mycotoxin Occurrence in Feed: A Ten-Year Survey
Gruber-Dorninger, C., Jenkins, T., & Schatzmayr, G. (2019) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins11070375 · Cited by 747
Fumonisins: Impact on Agriculture, Food, and Human Health and their Management Strategies
Kamle, M., Mahato, D. K., Devi, S., Lee, K. E., Kang, S. G., & Kumar, P. (2019) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins11060328 · Cited by 298
Degola, F., Morcia, C., Bisceglie, F., Mussi, F., Tumino, G., Ghizzoni, R., Pelosi, G., Terzi, V., Buschini, A., Restivo, F. M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.02.009 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Chulze, S. N.
- Venue
- Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-03-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 651-657
- ISSN
- 1944-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-0057
- OpenAlex
- W1991194706
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies to reduce mycotoxin levels in maize during storage: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19440040903573032
- The paper
- Chulze, S. N. (2010). Strategies to reduce mycotoxin levels in maize during storage: a review. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440040903573032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.