Cited by 50Celiac Disease Research and ManagementFood Safety and HygieneFood composition and properties

Gluten contamination of naturally gluten-free flours and starches used by Canadians with celiac disease

Koerner, Terence B., Cleroux, Chantal, Poirier, Christine, Cantin, Isabelle, La Vieille, Sébastien, Hayward, Stephen, Dubois, Sheila·2013·Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A

Abstract

A large national investigation into the extent of gluten cross-contamination of naturally gluten-free ingredients (flours and starches) sold in Canada was performed. Samples (n = 640) were purchased from eight Canadian cities and via the internet during the period 2010-2012 and analysed for gluten contamination. The results showed that 61 of the 640 (9.5%) samples were contaminated above the Codex-recommended maximum level for gluten-free products (20 mg kg⁻¹) with a range of 5-7995 mg kg⁻¹. For the ingredients that were labelled gluten-free the contamination range (5-141 mg kg⁻¹) and number of samples were lower (3 of 268). This picture was consistent over time, with approximately the same percentage of samples above 20 mg kg⁻¹ in both the initial set and the subsequent lot. Looking at the total mean (composite) contamination for specific ingredients the largest and most consistent contaminations come from higher fibre ingredients such as soy (902 mg kg⁻¹), millet (272 mg kg⁻¹) and buckwheat (153 mg kg⁻¹). Of the naturally gluten-free flours and starches tested that do not contain a gluten-free label, the higher fibre ingredients would constitute the greatest probability of being contaminated with gluten above 20 mg kg⁻¹.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19440049.2013.840744

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koerner, T. B., Cleroux, C., Poirier, C., Cantin, I., La Vieille, S., Hayward, S., & Dubois, S.
Affiliations
Health Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Koerner, Terence B.
Venue
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
Published
2013-12
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
2017-2021
ISSN
  • 1944-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-0057
OpenAlex
W2003745732
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Additives & Contaminants Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
celiac disease, soybean flour, millet, buckwheat
MeSH terms
Canada, Celiac Disease, Edible Grain, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fiber, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Flour, Food Contamination, Food Handling, Food Labeling, Glutens, Humans, Panicum, Nuts, Seeds, Starch, Fagopyrum, Internet, Soy Foods, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review