Cited by 282Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Investigating microplastics bioaccumulation and biomagnification in seafood from the Persian Gulf: a threat to human health?

Akhbarizadeh, Razegheh, Moore, Farid, Keshavarzi, Behnam·2019·Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A

Abstract

High bioavailability of microplastics (MPs) in the marine environment has raised serious concern during the last few decades. Nevertheless, the trophic transfer of MPs within edible parts of the marine food webs remain unknown. In this study, bioaccumulation, biomagnification, and potential human intake of MPs in muscles and gills of five popular commercial species (3 fish, 1 crab, and 1 prawn) from the Persian Gulf were investigated. The surface structure characteristics of the material and elemental composition signatures were used to screen for likely MPs and rule out non-plastics. Among the studied species, Penaeus semisulcatus and Epinephelus coioides displayed the highest (mean 0.360 items/g muscle) and lowest (mean 0.158 items/g muscle) MPs level in their muscles, respectively. The number of extracted MPs from the gills was higher than the muscle of the analyzed species, especially when it comes to scavengers and filter feeders such as (Liza klunzingeri, Portunus armatus, and P. semisulcatus).The results of the trophic magnification factor (TMF) and biomagnification factor (BMF) calculation indicated that MPs were not biomagnified in edible parts of the marine food web of the Persian Gulf. Hence, contrary to previous belief, MPs trophic dilution occurs rather than magnification in edible parts of seafood. The assessment of human intake of MPs highlights the possible risks posed by seafood consumption to the the human population depending to a great extent on a seafood diet. Considering possible physical and chemical toxicity of MPs and their associated contaminants, routine consumption of high doses of the studied seafood should be controlled for vulnerable groups such as pregnant/lactating women and their children to ensure their safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19440049.2019.1649473

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 95 · Cited by 282

Authors
Akhbarizadeh, R., Moore, F., & Keshavarzi, B.
Affiliations
Shiraz University (IR)
Corresponding author
Moore, Farid
Venue
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
1696-1708
ISSN
  • 1944-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-0057
OpenAlex
W2966878268
Cited by
282
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Additives & Contaminants Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Iran National Science Foundation
  • Shiraz University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
microplastics, bioaccumulation, biomagnification, seafood, Persian Gulf, human dietary exposure, trophic transfer, Penaeus semisulcatus, Epinephelus coioides, Liza klunzingeri, Portunus armatus, trophic dilution, seafood safety
MeSH terms
Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Food Contamination, Gills, Humans, Iran, Muscles, Plastics, Quality Control, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Seafood, Geologic Sediments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review