CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 144Political Theory and DemocracyPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction: Embedding participatory governance

Open access
Bussu, Sonia, Bua, Adrian, Dean, Rikki, Smith, Graham·2022·Critical Policy Studies
DOI 10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This symposium examines the challenges and opportunities of recent efforts at embedding participatory governance. It draws together original research that engages theoretically and empirically with some fundamental questions:•What are the challenges of embedding participatory governance in policy-making?•What happens when social movements have opportunities to shape the institutionalization of PG processes? Can they reanimate the radical potential of citizen participation for social transformation?•How can the tensions between the different demands of lay citizens, organized civil society, political parties, and public officials be managed?In this introductory article, we provide a definition of embeddedness, outlining its spatial, temporal, and practices dimensions, in so doing distinguishing embeddedness from institutionalization, with which it has often been used interchangeably. Our aim is to delineate the breadth of the concept, drawing together its many uses into a systematic framework that can both guide future research and practical experimentation. In particular, our hope is to turn more attention to the informal practices that are essential for embedding. The contributions to the symposium shift attention from institutional design to embedding dynamics and how these work to open or close spaces for meaningful citizen input.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bollier D, 2012, Renewal, 15
  2. Courant D, 2021, The Promises and Disappointments of the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate
  3. Crouch C, 2004, Post-democracy
  4. Henderson J., 2020, Local Government Studies
  5. Hendriks C. M., 2018, Political Studies, 003232171879137
  6. Polanyi Karl., 2001, The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time
  7. Santos B. D. S., 2005, Democratizing Democracy: Beyond the Liberal Democratic Canon. Verso
  8. Smith G, 2019, Political Studies, 003232171988510
  9. Suiter J., 2019, Representation, 1
  10. Tejado L. M, 2012, Perspectives on Federalism, 4, 270

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–143 of 143

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bussu, S., Bua, A., Dean, R., & Smith, G.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Leicester Castle Business School, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • University of Westminster (GB)
Corresponding author
Bussu, Sonia
ORCID
Venue
Critical Policy Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2022-03-20
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
133-145
ISSN
  • 1946-0171 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-018X
DOI
10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179
OpenAlex
W4220920390
Cited by
144
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4
FWCI
80.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Critical Policy Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
participatory governance, embeddedness, institutionalization, citizen participation, social movements, policy making, civil society, political parties, public officials, informal practices, social change, institutional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review