CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38Legal Issues in South AfricaIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

C ustomary L aw and D omestic V iolence in R ural S outh A frican C ommunities

Curran, Ericka, Bonthuys, Elsje·2005·South African Journal on Human Rights
DOI 10.1080/19962126.2005.11865150
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

(2005). Customary Law and Domestic Violence in Rural South African Communities. South African Journal on Human Rights: Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 607-635.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19962126.2005.11865150

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Curran, E., & Bonthuys, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
ORCID
Bonthuys, Elsje
Venue
South African Journal on Human Rights
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-01
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
607-635
ISSN
  • 0258-7203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-2126
DOI
10.1080/19962126.2005.11865150
OpenAlex
W1487192358
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 16 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
South African Journal on Human Rights (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in South Africa
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
customary law, domestic violence, rural communities, South Africa, gender-based violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review