Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thermophilic Adaptation of Proteins

Sterner, Rein hard, Liebl, Wolfgang·2001·Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Abstract

Hyperthermophilic organisms optimally grow close to the boiling point of water. As a consequence, their macromolecules must be much more thermostable than those from mesophilic species. Here, proteins from hyperthermophiles and mesophiles are compared with respect to their thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities. The known differences in amino acid sequences and three-dimensional structures between intrinsically thermostable and thermolabile proteins will be summarized, and the crucial role of electrostatic interactions for protein stability at high temperatures will be highlighted. Successful attempts to increase the thermostability of proteins, which were either based on rational design or on directed evolution, are presented. The relationship between high thermo-stability of enzymes from hyperthermophiles and their low catalytic activity at room temperature is discussed. Not all proteins from hyperthermophiles are thermostable enough to retain their structures and functions at the high physiological temperatures. It will be shown how this shortcoming can be surpassed by extrinsic factors such as large molecular chaperones and small compatible solutes. Finally, the potential of thermostable enzymes for biotechnology is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20014091074174

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Sterner, R. H., & Liebl, W.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Published
2001-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
39-106
ISSN
  • 0045-6411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1040-9238
  • 1549-7798
OpenAlex
W2159422614
Cited by
388
References
1
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.