Cited by 413Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFish biology, ecology, and behaviorAquaculture disease management and microbiota

The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain.

Rose, James D.·2002·Reviews in Fisheries Science

Abstract

This review examines the neurobehavioral nature of fishes and addresses the question of whether fishes are capable of experiencing pain and suffering. The detrimental effects of anthropomorphic thinking and the importance of an evolutionary perspective for understanding the neurobehavioral differences between fishes and humans are discussed. The differences in central nervous system structure that underlie basic neurobehavioral differences between fishes and humans are described. The literature on the neural basis of consciousness and of pain is reviewed, showing that: (1) behavioral responses to noxious stimuli are separate from the psychological experience of pain, (2) awareness of pain in humans depends on functions of specific regions of cerebral cortex, and (3) fishes lack these essential brain regions or any functional equivalent, making it untenable that they can experience pain. Because the experience of fear, similar to pain, depends on cerebral cortical structures that are absent from fish brains, it is concluded that awareness of fear is impossible for fishes. Although it is implausible that fishes can experience pain or emotions, they display robust, nonconscious, neuroendocrine, and physiological stress responses to noxious stimuli. Thus, avoidance of potentially injurious stress responses is an important issue in considerations about the welfare of fishes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20026491051668

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sentience does not require a mammalian neo-cortical organization.

    “Whereas some biologists infer that animals like fish do not suffer pain because they do not have a mammalian-like neo-cortical representation of nociceptive stimuli (Rose, 2002; Key, 2016), like Merker (2016) and many other biologists, we argue that sentience does not require a mammalian neo-cortical organization.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 413

Authors
Rose, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
Rose, James D.
Venue
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Published
2002-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-38
ISSN
  • 1064-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6553
OpenAlex
W2043218081
Cited by
413
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
FWCI
22.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reviews in Fisheries Science (publishedVersion)
  • WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Keywords
fish sentience, anthropomorphism, evolutionary perspective, neural basis of consciousness, cerebral cortex, fear, stress response, neuroendocrine stress response, fish welfare, avoidance behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review