Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is it risky to go green? A volatility analysis of the green bond market

Pham, Linh·2016·Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment

Abstract

Since its inception in 2007, the green bond market has experienced a compound growth rate of 50% annually. In 2014, green bond issuance totaled USD 36.6 billion, more than threefold its previous year's level of USD 11 billion. This new market is a response to the growing demand of investors for financial investments that are beneficial both environmentally and economically. As the green bond market continues to grow, it is important to obtain a better understanding of the risk and return behavior of the market. This paper is the first to analyze the volatility behavior of the green bond market using data on daily closing prices of the S&P green bond indices between April 2010 and April 2015. Building on a multivariate GARCH framework, my empirical results show that the ‘labeled’ segment of the green bond market experiences large volatility clustering while the pattern of volatility clustering is weaker in the ‘unlabeled’ segment of the market. I also found that a shock in the overall conventional bond market tends to spill over into the green bond market, where this spillover effect is variable over time. These results are meaningful insights into this new, yet very promising market, therefore, have important implications for asset pricing, portfolio management and risk management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20430795.2016.1237244

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Pham, L.
Venue
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
Published
2016-10
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
263-291
ISSN
  • 2043-0795 (ISSN-L)
  • 2043-0809
OpenAlex
W2535036018
Cited by
344
References
2
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is it risky to go green? A volatility analysis of the green bond market. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/20430795.2016.1237244
The paper
Pham, L. (2016). Is it risky to go green? A volatility analysis of the green bond market. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1237244

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.