Cited by 254Sustainable Finance and Green BondsCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

Does sustainability generate better financial performance? review, meta-analysis, and propositions

Open access
Atz, Ulrich, Van Holt, Tracy, Liu, Zongyuan Zoe, Bruno, Christopher C.·2023·Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment

Abstract

Sustainability in business and ESG (environmental, social, and governance) in finance have exploded in popularity among researchers and practitioners. We surveyed 1,141 primary peer-reviewed papers and 27 meta-reviews (based on ∼1,400 underlying studies) published between 2015 and 2020. Aggregate conclusions from a sample suggest that the financial performance of ESG investing has on average been indistinguishable from conventional investing (with one in three studies indicating superior performance) – in contrast with research in the wider management literature as well as industry reports. Until recently top finance journals did not publish climate change related studies, yet these studies capture the frontier of corporate risk and ESG investment strategies. We developed three propositions: first, ESG integration as a strategy seems to perform better than screening or divestment; second, ESG investing provides asymmetric benefits, especially during a social or economic crisis; and third, decarbonization strategies can potentially capture a climate risk premium.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20430795.2022.2106934

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 254

Authors
Atz, U., Van Holt, T., Liu, Z. Z., & Bruno, C. C.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Insight Network LLC, New York, NY, USA
  • Council on Foreign Relations (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Atz, Ulrich
Venue
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
Published
2022-08-19
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
802-825
ISSN
  • 2043-0795 (ISSN-L)
  • 2043-0809
OpenAlex
W4294349391
Cited by
254
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
34.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cooperative Research Centre for Infrastructure and Engineering Asset Management (NULL)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
ESG investing, corporate sustainability, financial performance, ESG integration, ESG screening, divestiture, decarbonization, business risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review