CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38Education Discipline and InequalityEducational Leadership and PracticesTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Being heard: how a listening culture supports the implementation of schoolwide restorative practices

Brown, Martha A.·2017·Restorative Justice
DOI 10.1080/20504721.2017.1294792
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Schoolwide restorative practices (SWRPs) are intentionally designed to create safe spaces for caring dialogue, where students and adults alike speak honestly and openly with each other. Data presented in this article were derived from a larger mixed-methods multi-site case study of two Oakland Unified School District middle schools that had adopted SWRPs and provide support for addressing the questions: (a) How do principals, teachers, staff and students perceive being heard in middle schools that have adopted SWRPs; and (b) How does a listening culture contribute to creating a positive, healthy relational ecology that supports schoolwide change and reform efforts? This study provides evidence that a listening culture built on relational trust can contribute to a positive relational ecology that supports members of a school community as they go through the challenging and sometimes difficult process of changing their school culture.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20504721.2017.1294792

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Amstutz L., 2005, The little book of restorative discipline for schools
  2. Ball R., 2003, Reclaiming Children and Youth, 12, 49
  3. Boyes-Watson C., 2015, Circle forward: building a restorative school community
  4. Claassen R., 2008, Discipline that restores
  5. Evans K. R., 2016, The little book of restorative justice in education
  6. Freire P., 2008, Pedagogy of the oppressed
  7. Morrison B., 2007, Restoring safe school communities: a whole school response to bullying, violence and alienation
  8. Pranis K., 2005, The little book of circle processes
  9. Reyes A. H., 2006, Discipline, achievement, race

Cited by

See all 38

Related

Metadata

Authors
Brown, M. A.
Corresponding author
Brown, Martha A.
ORCID
Brown, Martha A.
Venue
Restorative Justice
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-01-02
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
53-69
ISSN
  • 2050-4721 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-473X
DOI
10.1080/20504721.2017.1294792
OpenAlex
W2610151642
Cited by
38
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Restorative Justice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
listening culture, being heard, relational trust, relational ecology, school culture change, junior high school, school safety, educational reform, teacher-student relationship, Oakland Unified School District

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review