AI-based automated speech therapy tools for persons with speech sound disorder: a systematic literature review
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a systematic literature review of published studies on AI-based automated speech therapy tools for persons with speech sound disorders (SSD). The COVID-19 pandemic has initiated the requirement for automated speech therapy tools for persons with SSD making speech therapy accessible and affordable. However, there are no guidelines for designing such automated tools and their required degree of automation compared to human experts. In this systematic review, we followed the PRISMA framework to address four research questions: 1) what types of SSD do AI-based automated speech therapy tools address, 2) what is the level of autonomy achieved by such tools, 3) what are the different modes of intervention, and 4) how effective are such tools in comparison with human experts. An extensive search was conducted on digital libraries to find research papers relevant to our study from 2007 to 2022. The results show that AI-based automated speech therapy tools for persons with SSD are increasingly gaining attention among researchers. Articulation disorders were the most frequently addressed SSD based on the reviewed papers. Further, our analysis shows that most researchers proposed fully automated tools without considering the role of other stakeholders. Our review indicates that mobile-based and gamified applications were the most frequent mode of intervention. The results further show that only a few studies compared the effectiveness of such tools compared to expert Speech-Language Pathologists (SLP). Our paper presents the state-of- the-art in the field, contributes significant insights based on the research questions, and provides suggestions for future research directions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · Cited by 26,092 · see citing works
The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 · Cited by 11,748 · see citing works
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741 · see citing works
Graves, A., Fernández, S., Gomez, F., & Schmidhuber, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06 · doi:10.1145/1143844.1143891 · Cited by 5,370 · see citing works
The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., et al. (2018) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-180221 · Cited by 4,737 · see citing works
Automatic speech recognition and speech variability: A review
Benzeghiba, M., De Mori, R., Deroo, O., Dupont, S., Erbes, T., Jouvet, D., Fissore, L., Laface, P., Mertins, A., Ris, C., et al. (2007) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2007.02.006 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Systematic review of virtual speech therapists for speech disorders
Chen, Y.-P. P., Johnson, C., Lalbakhsh, P., Caelli, T., Deng, G., Tay, D., Erickson, S., Broadbridge, P., El Refaie, A., Doube, W., et al. (2016) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2015.08.005 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benway, N. R., & Preston, J. L. (2025) · Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2025_lshss-24-00085 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Gallano, G., Giglio, A., & Ferre, A. (2025) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.010 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Kim, N., Homer, M., & Jang, H. (2025) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2025_ajslp-24-00464 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Balo, E., Ökte, B., & Selvi Balo, S. (2025) · The European Research Journal · doi:10.18621/eurj.1677704 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Deka, C., Shrivastava, A., Abraham, A. K., Nautiyal, S., & Chauhan, P.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
- All India Institute of Speech and Hearing (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Shrivastava, Abhishek
- Venue
- Speech, Language and Hearing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-06-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2050-571X (ISSN-L)
- 2050-5728
- OpenAlex
- W4399301504
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Speech Language and Hearing (publishedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- speech sound disorders, articulation disorders, gamified interventions, computer-based intervention, human-centered AI, job displacement, algorithmic bias, privacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
