The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clovis and Early Archaic Crania from the Anzick Site (24PA506), Park County, Montana
Abstract
The Anzick archaeological site in Montana, known since 1968, has been recognized since 1974 as Clovis age because of the lithic material recovered. Now it is possible to assert that some, but not all, of the recovered skeletal material is also Clovis age. The site contained more than 100 stone and nonhuman bone artifacts in association with the partial skeletal remains of a young child. All were covered with red ocher. The partial cranium of a second youth, not stained red, was also recovered. Recently, radiocarbon dating of these two crania produced two separate ages, 2000 years apart. Forensic examination of the remains, completed in 1999, has determined their ages at death. This site, an important addition to New World prehistory, contains not only the largest single assemblage of Clovis artifacts but also the only known Clovis skeletal remains.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The only known Clovis burial and associated mortuary assemblage was found in the Americas at the Anzick site, Montana, in 1968.
“The only known Clovis burial and associated mortuary assemblage was found in the Americas at the Anzick site, Montana, in 19686–8 (Figure 1a,b).”
From The genome of a Late Pleistocene human from a Clovis burial site in western Montana (2014) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Stafford, T.W., Jr. 1994 Accelerator C-14 Dating of Human Fossil Skeletons: Assessing Accuracy and Results on New World Specimens. In Method and Theory for Investigating the Peopling of the Americas, edited by R. Bonnichsen and G. Steele, pp. 45-55. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genome of a Late Pleistocene human from a Clovis burial site in western Montana
Rasmussen, M., Anzick, S. L., Waters, M. R., Skoglund, P., DeGiorgio, M., Stafford, T. W., Rasmussen, S., Moltke, I., Albrechtsen, A., Doyle, S. M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13025 · Cited by 562
Metadata
- Authors
- Owsley, D. W., & Hunt, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Smithsonian Institution (US)
- Venue
- Plains Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 176
- Pages
- 115-124
- ISSN
- 0032-0447 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-546X
- OpenAlex
- W49465250
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Plains Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- Clovis culture, Early Archaic, human crania, skeletal remains, radiocarbon dating, forensic age estimation, lithic artifacts, child remains
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review