The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review
Open accessAbstract
Mapping key areas for ecosystem service (ES) supply is essential for the development of strategies that will ensure their future supply. Given the rapid development in this area of research, we performed a review of different approaches used to map ES, with a special focus on those that use social–ecological data. We used an analytical framework based on five criteria for analyzing and comparing the methodological approaches: the types of ES, availability of data sources, types of data sources, spatial scale, and methods used to model ES. We found that regulating services were the most commonly mapped, followed by provisioning, cultural, and supporting services. Secondary (readily available) data were used more frequently than primary data to map ES. Biophysical data (land-cover variables) and mixed sources (databases like global statistics) were the most commonly employed ones. Most studies were performed at the regional or at the national scale. The most commonly used method to model services was the development of models based on the well-known causal relationships between environmental variables, followed by the extrapolation of ES values from primary data to the total analyzed area frequently using land-cover maps. Our synthesis reveals that the majority of studies are based on secondary data, applied at broad scales, without validation techniques. There is an urgent need to develop methods for deepening our understanding of the social–ecological processes behind the supply of ES in order to improve our ability to map ES for decision making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1998) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(98)00020-2 · Cited by 2,986
Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4645 · Cited by 2,846
Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D., & Gordon, L. J. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x · Cited by 2,481
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K. M., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., et al. (2009) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/080023 · Cited by 2,389 · cited 4×
“Yet, the relationships between land-cover variables and ES supply have been untested in most regions of the world (Naidoo et al. 2008; Bennett et al. 2009; Nelson et al. 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialScience for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R. S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808772106 · Cited by 2,257
What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 · Cited by 2,143
Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107 · Cited by 2,016
Cited by
Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level
Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E., & Bieling, C. (2013) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013 · Cited by 1,208
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777 · Cited by 1,110
A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services
Crossman, N. D., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Willemen, L., Petz, K., Palomo, I., Drakou, E. G., Martín-Lopez, B., McPhearson, T., Boyanova, K., et al. (2013) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001 · Cited by 720
Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals
Wood, S. L. R., Jones, S. K., Johnson, J. A., Brauman, K. A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Fremier, A., Girvetz, E., Gordon, L. J., Kappel, C. V., Mandle, L., et al. (2018) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010 · Cited by 549
Venter, Z. S., Barton, D. N., Chakraborty, T., Simensen, T., & Singh, G. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14164101 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Martínez-Harms, M. J., & Balvanera, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 17-25
- ISSN
- 2151-3732 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-3740
- OpenAlex
- W1988322132
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 25.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
- The paper
- Martínez-Harms, M. J., & Balvanera, P. (2012). Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
