Using the ADDIE Model and Universal Design for Learning Principles to Develop an Open Online Course for Teacher Professional Development
Abstract
As part of a collaborative graduate course project, my students and I, Author A, sought to design an online learning experience that would support the professional growth of teachers located around the world. We used the ADDIE instructional design model and Universal Design for Learning principles to guide the development of an open online course that would meet the diverse needs of the learners. Analysis of the postcourse survey data revealed that the majority of participants who completed the course were able to achieve the course learning objectives as well as their professional learning goals. This article details the course design and facilitation process and offers insights about how to develop effective online learning experiences for educators.(Keywords: MOOC, online course, professional development, teacher learning, twitter)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ADDIE model is widely known and recognized as a model for designing and evaluating learning experiences, courses, and educational content.
“According to its basic theoretical and philosophical characteristics, the specific model-ADDIE-is widely known and recognized as a model for designing and evaluating learning experiences, courses, and educational content (e.g., Trust and Pektas [30]).”
From A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education (2022) · cites this paper as Trust and Pektas [30]
Social media tools (such as Facebook and Twitter) used as educational resources to develop students' social participation in the teaching process were suggested in the examined model.
“Additionally, the social media tools (such as Facebook and Twitter) used as educational resources to develop students' social participation in the teaching process were suggested in the examined model (e.g., Trust and Pektas [30]).”
From A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education (2022) · cites this paper as Trust and Pektas [30]
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13090402 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
- Authors
- Trust, T., & Pektas, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst
- ORCID
- Trust, Torrey
- Venue
- Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-10-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 219-233
- ISSN
- 2153-2974 (ISSN-L)
- 2332-7383
- OpenAlex
- W2913804354
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 14.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Education and E-Learning
- Keywords
- ADDIE model, Universal Design for Learning, open online courses, teacher professional development, MOOCs, online course design, course facilitation, Twitter, inclusive learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
