The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pricing Carbon for Climate Justice
Abstract
This paper focuses on one particular case that connects climate justice and climate economics. Its contribution is twofold. First, it aims at providing a sound normative foundation for carbon pricing mechanisms around the notions of a ‘right to energy’, the ‘duty not-to-harm’ and an argument for ‘restricted compensation’. Second, it identifies the normative elements from theories of climate justice that should guide the design of market-based instruments for climate change mitigation. This will cast light on the particular moral relevance of the act of internalizing a negative externality and of the funds generated by putting a price on carbon.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The challenge of tackling embodied emissions in trade is confronted with various temporal and spatial inequities (see Section 2.3) (14, 25, 145-150).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [145]
Citations
Cites
Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles
Nykvist, B., & Nilsson, M. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2564 · Cited by 1,819
Measuring the Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation
Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Herrero, S. T., Dubash, N. K., & Lecocq, F. (2014) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-031312-125456 · Cited by 273
Polluter-Pays-Principle: The Cardinal Instrument for Addressing Climate Change
Khan, M. (2015) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws4030638 · Cited by 69
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1038/nclimate1131 · DOI
- 10.1080/13563467.2011.578735 · DOI
- 10.1163/9789401205689_014 · DOI
- Bowen A., 2011, The case for carbon pricing
- Broome J., 2012, Climate matters: Ethics in a warming world
- 10.1080/13698230903326331 · DOI
- 10.1111/papa.12005 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1358246111000282 · DOI
- Dessler A. E., 2012, Introduction to modern climate change
- 10.1111/ecoj.12188 · DOI
- 10.1080/21550085.2016.1173282 · DOI
- DOE, 2017, U.S. energy and employment report
- Gajevic Sayegh A., 2018, The routledge handbook of climate justice, 153, 10.4324/9781315537689-12 · DOI
- 10.1080/17449626.2018.1425217 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199996476.003.0009 · DOI
- GCF, 2014, Decisions of the board – Eighth meeting of the board
- Green F., 2015, Nationally self-interested climate change mitigation: A unified conceptual framework
- 10.1080/14693062.2016.1156515 · DOI
- Hawken P., 2017, Drawdown. The most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming
- IPCC, 2013, Fifth assessment report (AR5)
- IPCC, 2018, Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, 32
- Kaswan A., 2014, The ethics of global climate change (pp. 232–254)
- 10.1038/s41370-017-0014-9 · DOI
- 10.1080/09644016.2018.1414747 · DOI
- 10.1080/13698230.2011.529708 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10584-015-1382-6 · DOI
- Miller D., 2009, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 28, 119
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.086 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511732294.004 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aam6284 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.1624952 · DOI
- 10.1177/0032321716647401 · DOI
- Parfit D., 2010, Climate ethics: Essential readings (pp. 112–121)
- 10.1515/9781400834402 · DOI
- Ragan C., 2015, The way forward: A practical approach to reducing Canada’s greenhouse
- 10.7312/sach18404 · DOI
- Shue H., 1994, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 1, 343
- 10.2307/2624835 · DOI
- Shue H., 2014, Climate justice
- 10.1017/CBO9780511817434 · DOI · Paper page
- Stern N., 2015, Why are we waiting? The logic, ugency and promise of tackling climate change, 10.7551/mitpress/10408.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1038/530407a · DOI
- Stiglitz J., 2011, The Economists’ Voice: Top Economists Take On Today's Problems (pp. 22–27). New York, NY: Columbia University Press
- 10.1086/676039 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203123805-7 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade
Grubb, M., Jordan, N. D., Hertwich, E., Neuhoff, K., Das, K., Bandyopadhyay, K. R., van Asselt, H., Sato, M., Wang, R., Pizer, W. A., et al. (2022) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-120820-053625 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Sayegh, A. G.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sayegh, Alexandre Gajevic
- Venue
- Ethics, Policy & Environment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-05-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-130
- ISSN
- 2155-0085 (ISSN-L)
- 2155-0093
- OpenAlex
- W2949798042
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethics Policy & Environment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N009010/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Keywords
- carbon pricing, climate justice, right to energy, climate change mitigation, carbon funds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
