Cited by 3Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Theory and DemocracyMedia Influence and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Who is mobilized to vote by information about voter ID laws?

Endres, Kyle, Panagopoulos, Costas·2023·Politics, Groups, and Identities

Abstract

Advocacy groups often work to educate the public about voting requirements following changes to election laws. These outreach efforts have the potential to mobilize partisan groups who consider the laws a threat to their party’s electoral prospects. In the 2017 Virginia election, we partnered with an advocacy organization to conduct a field experiment evaluating the effects of the organization’s outreach campaign. We randomized which registered voters were mailed one of three informational postcards providing details about voter identification requirements in place at the time in Virginia. Overall, the postcards had minimal effects on turnout compared to the no-contact control group. However, each version of the postcards significantly increased turnout among subgroups based on their underlying partisanship and/or vote-propensity. Democrats were significantly mobilized by postcards highlighting the potentially disproportionate impact of ID laws on demographic groups that traditionally support the Democratic Party, with approximately a two percentage point increase in turnout overall, and even higher increases among high vote-propensity Democrats. A simple, informational postcard, on the other hand, elevated turnout among low vote-propensity recipients by two percentage points. The postcard treatments did not significantly increase turnout among Republicans or mid vote-propensity registrants of either party.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21565503.2021.1932530

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00354.x · DOI
  2. Biggers D. R., 2019, Political Behavior, 1
  3. 10.1017/S0007123418000157 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1065912917691638 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/696616 · DOI
  6. 10.1089/elj.2013.0209 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/17457289.2017.1378222 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S0022381613001308 · DOI
  9. 10.1089/elj.2008.0017 · DOI
  10. Gerber A., 2012, Field Experiments: Design, Analysis and Interpretation
  11. 10.1086/696618 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/ssqu.12541 · DOI
  13. 10.1086/696617 · DOI
  14. 10.1086/688343 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/1532673X08316608 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/1532440012452279 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/jels.12142 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/S0003055414000604 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/poq/nfx041 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1532673X11398438 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/poq/nfz027 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/1065912915577208 · DOI
  24. 10.1017/S1049096509090301 · DOI
  25. Stewart C., 2016, Stan. L. Rev, 68, 1455
  26. 10.1111/pops.12332 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Endres, K., & Panagopoulos, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Northern Iowa (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Endres, Kyle
Venue
Politics, Groups, and Identities
Published
2021-06-09
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
143-157
ISSN
  • 2156-5503 (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-5511
OpenAlex
W3172447039
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Politics Groups and Identities (publishedVersion)
Funders
MIT New Initiatives in Elections Sciences Grant
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
voter ID laws, voter turnout, voter mobilization, advocacy organizations, voter outreach, partisanship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review