Cited by 6Education and Military IntegrationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk Screening of Veterans Throughout the Life Course

VanTil, L. D., MacLean, M. B., Coulthard, J., Murray, R., Lourenso, S., Camarda, J., Lea, T.·2022·Military Behavioral Health

Abstract

Both the Canadian Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Canada identified the need for a brief standardized tool to screen military members and veterans for the risk of a difficult adjustment to civilian life, frailty, suicide and homelessness. Data from Life After Service Studies (n = 8,101) were used to build logistic regression models of difficult adjustment to civilian life. The resulting brief risk screener was piloted in 2018 (n = 246). The modeling considered 28 risk indicators, used 17 of these to build the models, and maintained 8 questions for a brief risk screener. Optimal cutoff was found with a threshold of 3+ for difficult adjustment to civilian life, with 39% sensitivity (95% CI: 37.9 to 41.1) and 94% specificity (95% CI: 93.1 to 94.6). A longer 10 item questionnaire was implemented. Pilot participants who were help-seeking veteran clients had frequency by risk level of 42% low, 40% moderate, and 18% high. Pilot participants who were serving military members had frequency by risk level of 79% low, 13% moderate, and 8% high. In 2019, Canadian government implemented a new standardized risk screening tool to improve the effectiveness of services and referrals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21635781.2021.2007186

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Hébert R., 2003, Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien, 49, 992
  2. IOM Institute of Medicine, 2015, Vital signs: Core metrics for health and health care progress; Chap. 4: The core measure set
  3. MacLean, M. B., VanTil, L., Murray, R. & Ralling, A. (2019). Risk screening at VAC: Review and considerations. Research Directorate Report, Veterans Affairs Canada, January 14, 2019. http://publications.gc.ca/pub?id=9.870545&sl=0
  4. Mawani F. N., 2010, Health Reports, 21, 61
  5. Seed P., 2001, Stata Technical Bulletin, 5
  6. VanTil L., 2011, Shaping the future: Military and veteran health research (pp. 317-322)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
VanTil, L. D., MacLean, M. B., Coulthard, J., Murray, R., Lourenso, S., Camarda, J., & Lea, T.
Affiliations
  • Veterans Affairs Canada (CA)
  • Department of National Defence (CA)
Corresponding author
VanTil, L. D.
Venue
Military Behavioral Health
Published
2021-12-02
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
17-26
ISSN
  • 2163-5781 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-5803
OpenAlex
W4200252759
Cited by
6
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Military Behavioral Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
risk screening, veterans, military personnel, suicide risk, homelessness, frailty, logistic regression, help-seeking, Canadian Armed Forces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review