The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Millennial and generation Z digital marketing communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration
Abstract
Millennials are among the largest age cohorts in United States commanding the strong buying power. They are digital natives perplexing the marketing world to develop effective digital advertising strategies because they have become expert at avoiding digital advertising designed to influence their consumer behavior. Using a digital distraction during an advertisement is a Millennial behavior and they are not likely to read, listen to, or watch digital advertisements in their entirety. Marketers are challenged to uncover new insights relating to how to hold Millennial attention with digital marketing/advertising communication. This research explored questions on how marketers can better serve the Millennial consumer in the United States with digital marketing/advertising communication that is engaging, informative and influential to their consumer behavior. The research also explored similarities and differences in digital marketing/advertising engagement among Millennials and the Generation Z age cohort because Generation Z represents the largest age cohort coming of age. The research was conducted using the qualitative methods of focus groups, an online bulletin board and one-on-one in-depth interviews. The findings suggest that digital marketing/advertising that is short, with music, humor and the use of social media influencers has a positive impact on both age cohorts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Sloane-Seale, A. (2009) · Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education · doi:10.21225/d54s3d · Cited by 14,328
(1998) · Cited by 13,501
Qualitative Research: Designing, Implementing, and Publishing a Study
Merriam, S. B. (2015) · Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-7409-7.ch007 · Cited by 2,474
Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches
Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2009) · Cited by 2,373
Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having and Being
Solomon, M. R. (1993) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 1,747
Longitudinal study of digital marketing strategies targeting Millennials
Taken Smith, K. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363761211206339 · Cited by 310
Qualitative market research : a comprehensive guide
Mariampolski, H. (2001) · Cited by 128
Impact of Social Media Marketing on Brand Experience: A Study of Select Apparel Brands on Facebook
Amin, F., & Khan, M. F. (2018) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/0972262918785962 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Chang, C.-W., & Chang, S.-H. (2023) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231191741 · Cited by 93
Li, S. H., Achilles, M. R., Spanos, S., Habak, S., Werner-Seidler, A., & O’Dea, B. (2022) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x22000095 · Cited by 39
In search of the next nexus: A maturing field for fashion research in the digital age
Voyer, B. G., & Ko, E. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.050 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Munsch, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-01-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-29
- ISSN
- 2163-9159 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-9167
- OpenAlex
- W3123627428
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 66.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Millennial and generation Z digital marketing communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808812
- The paper
- Munsch, A. (2021). Millennial and generation Z digital marketing communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808812
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.