Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 39 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Variability in body mass and sexual dimorphism in Danish red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in relation to population density

Open access

Abstract

For the first time, temporal variability in body size and sexual dimorphism is revealed in foxes Vulpes vulpes from the same geographical area at over time. The weights and lengths of 552 Danish foxes were documented during three different periods: 1965–1977, 2012–2014 and the winter of 2015/2016. During the first and the third periods, the fox population was below the carrying capacity due to hunting pressure and canine distemper, respectively. Adult males were significantly (p < 0.01) heavier (mean weight: 7.7 kg and 7.5 kg respectively) in periods of low population density, i.e. 1965–1977 and compared to 2015/2016, compared to 2012–2014, when population density was high (the mean weight: 6.8 kg). However, no significant differences were found in the weight of females. Hence, sexual dimorphism ranged from 7.6 to 3.6 in adult foxes in low and high-density periods, respectively. During the winters of 2012–2014, no difference in body fat measured by rump fat thickness (RFT) was found between age groups and genders in contrast to 2015/2016, when RFT was significantly (p < 0.001) larger in adult females (mean RFT: 0.77 cm) than in adult males (mean RFT = 0.58cm).

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

In Danish red foxes from the same Jutland area, adult male body mass and sexual dimorphism varied with population density: males were heavier and dimorphism larger when density was low (1965–1977 and 2015/2016) than when density was high (2012–2014), while female mass did not differ significantly across periods. In winter 2015/2016, adult females had greater rump fat thickness than adult males, contrasting with 2012–2014 when no significant overall sex/age differences in rump fat were found.

Key findings

  • Adult males were significantly heavier in low-density periods: mean 7.7 kg in 1965–1977 and 7.5 kg in 2015/2016 versus 6.8 kg in 2012–2014 (F = 6.3, p < 0.01; Hc = 10.9, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in female weight across periods (adult females: 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 kg).
  • Sexual dimorphism in adult body weight was 7.6% in 1965–1977, 6.1% in 2015/2016, and 3.6% in 2012–2014; significant sexual dimorphism was found in all three periods for both adults and subadults.
  • In winter 2015/2016, adult females had significantly greater rump fat thickness (mean 0.77 cm) than adult males (mean 0.58 cm) and subadult females; subadult females also had greater rump fat than subadult males (p < 0.02). In 2012–2014, no significant overall rump fat difference was found across sexes and age classes (F = 1.9, p = 0.14), though adult females were fatter than adult males in pairwise comparison.
  • Adult and subadult males in 2015/2016 were significantly longer than those in 2012–2014: adult males 114.4 cm versus 109.5 cm, and subadult males 113.0 cm versus 109.1 cm (p < 0.001). No significant length difference was found for females.

Methods

  • Three collections from agricultural Jutland, Denmark: 1965–1977 (collection A; 178 ear-tagged individuals from a mark-recapture study plus museum skeletons), 2012–2014 (collection B; 187 foxes >6 months old), and winter 2015/2016 (collection C; 187 shot foxes), totaling 552 foxes. Weights and lengths were recorded; age was determined by cementum annuli for B and C; rump fat thickness was measured for B and C.
  • Population density was proxied by National Game Bag Records, specifically Jutland game bags: low density in 1965–1977 due to hunting pressure and in 2015/2016 following canine distemper, and high density in 2012–2014.
  • Statistical analyses in PAST used one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests for period/region/age differences, t-tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests for pairwise comparisons, and sexual dimorphism was calculated as the percentage difference in mean length or mean weight, with cube root of mean body mass used for mass dimorphism.

Limitations

  • Stated: length was compared only between collections B and C because collection A was measured by a different person; rump fat thickness was not available from the museum collection, so it was compared only between B and C. Age determination had uncertainty: cementum lines develop between August and October of the second year, so foxes without cementum lines could be 6–11 months old and were grouped as subadults. Game bag records as a density proxy may depend on hunting effort, hunting behaviour, and legislation, though the study compared recent fluctuations by age only.
  • Stated: further studies are needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms and subsequent effects of fluctuating sexual dimorphism.
  • Evident: the design is observational and correlational, and the authors assumed genetic, geographical, and climatic factors were fixed over the study area and period without directly testing them; length and rump fat data were not available for all periods.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21658005.2017.1409997

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 1 Not valid · 24 Not checked · 44 Own results and interpretations

29 more claims

Create a free account to see all 69 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 28
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentz = 3.1reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .002

    “z = 3.1, p < .01”

  • Consistentz = 3.8reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “z = 3.8, p < .001”

  • Consistentz = 4.1reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “z = 4.1, p < .001”

  • Consistentz = 3.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “z = 3.6, p < .001”

4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Asferg T., 2014, Vildtudbyttestatistik for jagtsæsonen 2013/14
  2. Asferg T., 2016, Vildtudbyttestatistik for jagtsæsonenerne 2014/15 and 2015/16
  3. Bavnsgaard B., 1983, Bliver vore ræve pludselig større
  4. Cavallini P., 1995, Annales Zoologici Fennici, 32, 421
  5. 10.1111/jzo.2000.250.issue-3 · doi:10.1111/jzo.2000.250.issue-3
  6. Jensen B., 1973, Danish Review of Game Biology, 8, 1
  7. Lloyd H. G., 1980, The Red Fox
  8. Lloyd H. G., 1973, Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement, 19, 119
  9. Mayr E., 1970, Populations, Species and Evolution
  10. Pagh S., 2016, Flora og Fauna, 122, 46
  11. Roulichová J., 2007, Folia Zoologica, 56, 440
  12. Ryan W. J., 1990, Series B, Livestock Feeds and Feeding, 60, 653
  13. Whitlock R. E., 2003, The National Gamebag Census as a Tool for Monitoring Mammal Abundance in the UK
  14. Yom-Tov Y., 2003, Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5, 1037
  15. 10.1111/bij.2007.90.issue-4 · doi:10.1111/bij.2007.90.issue-4

Cited by

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Pagh, S., Hansen, M. S., Jensen, B., Pertoldi, C., & Chriél, M.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg Zoo (DK)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Pagh, Sussie
Venue
Zoology and Ecology
Published
2017-12-26
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 2165-8005 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-8013
OpenAlex
W2778463517
Cited by
10
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zoology and Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
red fox, body size, sexual dimorphism, population density, temporal variation, fat mass, rump fat thickness, hunting pressure, canine distemper, carrying capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variability in body mass and sexual dimorphism in Danish red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in relation to population density. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21658005.2017.1409997
The paper
Pagh, S., Hansen, M. S., Jensen, B., Pertoldi, C., & Chriél, M. (2018). Variability in body mass and sexual dimorphism in Danish red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in relation to population density. Zoology and Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2017.1409997

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.