Cited by 162News Media Framing and Political CommunicationJournalism and Media StudiesMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Quantified Audiences in News Production: A synthesis and research agenda

Zamith, Rodrigo·2018·Digital Journalism

Abstract

A number of social, technological, and economic shifts over the past two decades have led to the proliferation of audience analytics and metrics in journalism. This article contends that we are witnessing a third wave toward the rationalization of audience understanding and distinguishes between audience analytics (systems that capture information) and audience metrics (quantified measures output by those systems). The body of literature on analytics and metrics in the context of news production is then synthesized across the ABCDE of news production: attitudes, behaviors, content, discourse, and ethics. That synthesis leads to an overarching conclusion that while contemporary journalism is not being driven by quantified audiences, both audiences and quantification are playing far more prominent roles in news production than in the past. Scholars and practitioners have also become less pessimistic about analytics and metrics over time, recognizing more nuanced effects and prosocial possibilities. Finally, important gaps in the literature are identified and new research directions proposed to help address them.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21670811.2018.1444999

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 162

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Anderson C. W., 2011, International Journal of Communication, 5, 529
  2. 10.1177/1464884911402451 · DOI
  3. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262019835.001.0001 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01582.x · DOI
  5. 10.1177/0093650210384989 · DOI
  6. Braun Joshua, 2014, Connected Viewing: Selling, Streaming, & Sharing Media in the Digital Era, 124
  7. 10.1177/0894439313506845 · DOI
  8. Bruns Axel, 2008, Making Online News, 171
  9. 10.1080/23743670.2015.1119487 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1464884916688963 · DOI
  11. Cherubini Federica, 2016, Editorial Analytics: How News Media Are Developing and Using Audience Data and Metrics
  12. Coddington Mark, 2015, Boundaries of Journalism, 67, 10.4324/9781315727684-5 · DOI
  13. DeWerth-Pallmeyer Dwight, 1997, The Audience in News
  14. 10.1177/1527476417697271 · DOI
  15. Gans Herbert J., 1979, Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and TIME
  16. Graves Lucas, 2010, Confusion Online: Faulty Metrics and the Future of Digital Journalism
  17. Groves Jonathan, 2011, ISOJ, 1, 95
  18. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00794.x · DOI
  19. 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1241294 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1464884917720305 · DOI
  21. Hindman Matthew, 2017, Remaking the News: Essays on the Future of Journalism Scholarship in the Digital Age, 177, 10.7551/mitpress/10648.003.0017 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/hcre.12123 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0093650212467031 · DOI
  24. Lepisto Douglas A., 2015, International Handbook of Professional Identities, 11
  25. 10.1080/21670811.2014.927986 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/21670811.2014.976418 · DOI
  27. Lowrey Wilson, 2011, Changing the News: The Forces Shaping Journalism in Uncertain times
  28. 10.1177/107769901008700103 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/14616700601148879 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/15205436.2010.491934 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/256809 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/soc4.12376 · DOI
  33. 10.1108/02634500410516904 · DOI
  34. Nadler Anthony M., 2016, Making the News Popular: Mobilizing US News Audiences, 10.5406/illinois/9780252040146.001.0001 · DOI
  35. Napoli Philip M., 2011, Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences
  36. Nguyen An, 2013, Journalism: New Challenges, 146
  37. Petre Caitlin, 2015, The Traffic Factories: Metrics at Chartbeat, Gawker Media, and the New York times
  38. 10.1177/030631284014003004 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Schlesinger Philip, 1978, Putting “Reality” Together: BBC News
  40. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01408.x · DOI
  41. 10.1177/1461444814530541 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/1461670X.2014.946309 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.027 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/21670811.2014.909122 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/0002716204270469 · DOI
  46. Usher Nikki, 2012, International Journal of Communication, 6, 1898
  47. 10.1080/21670811.2013.801690 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/1464884913504259 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/1464884915595474 · DOI
  51. Wildman Steven S., 2006, Handbook of Media Management and Economics, 67
  52. 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1262215 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1146083 · DOI
  54. 10.1177/1077699017714223 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zamith, R.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Zamith, Rodrigo
Venue
Digital Journalism
Published
2018-03-06
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
418-435
ISSN
  • 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-082X
OpenAlex
W2792222873
Cited by
162
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5
FWCI
50.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Digital Journalism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
audience analytics, audience metrics, quantification, news production, audience understanding, journalism ethics, audience behavior, audience attitudes, audience discourse, news content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantified Audiences in News Production: A synthesis and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21670811.2018.1444999
The paper
Zamith, R. (2018). Quantified Audiences in News Production: A synthesis and research agenda. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1444999