The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Quantified Audiences in News Production: A synthesis and research agenda
Abstract
A number of social, technological, and economic shifts over the past two decades have led to the proliferation of audience analytics and metrics in journalism. This article contends that we are witnessing a third wave toward the rationalization of audience understanding and distinguishes between audience analytics (systems that capture information) and audience metrics (quantified measures output by those systems). The body of literature on analytics and metrics in the context of news production is then synthesized across the ABCDE of news production: attitudes, behaviors, content, discourse, and ethics. That synthesis leads to an overarching conclusion that while contemporary journalism is not being driven by quantified audiences, both audiences and quantification are playing far more prominent roles in news production than in the past. Scholars and practitioners have also become less pessimistic about analytics and metrics over time, recognizing more nuanced effects and prosocial possibilities. Finally, important gaps in the literature are identified and new research directions proposed to help address them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this context, web analytics can help website owners understand how their audience find, consume and interact with online information by providing web metrics that refer to any quantitative and aggregated measure of preferences, passive viewing or consumption of content by internet users [47,48].”
From Digital Storytelling in Cultural Heritage: Audience Engagement in the Interactive Documentary New Life (2021) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 162
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- Anderson C. W., 2011, International Journal of Communication, 5, 529
- 10.1177/1464884911402451 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262019835.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01582.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0093650210384989 · DOI
- Braun Joshua, 2014, Connected Viewing: Selling, Streaming, & Sharing Media in the Digital Era, 124
- 10.1177/0894439313506845 · DOI
- Bruns Axel, 2008, Making Online News, 171
- 10.1080/23743670.2015.1119487 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884916688963 · DOI
- Cherubini Federica, 2016, Editorial Analytics: How News Media Are Developing and Using Audience Data and Metrics
- Coddington Mark, 2015, Boundaries of Journalism, 67, 10.4324/9781315727684-5 · DOI
- DeWerth-Pallmeyer Dwight, 1997, The Audience in News
- 10.1177/1527476417697271 · DOI
- Gans Herbert J., 1979, Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and TIME
- Graves Lucas, 2010, Confusion Online: Faulty Metrics and the Future of Digital Journalism
- Groves Jonathan, 2011, ISOJ, 1, 95
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00794.x · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1241294 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884917720305 · DOI
- Hindman Matthew, 2017, Remaking the News: Essays on the Future of Journalism Scholarship in the Digital Age, 177, 10.7551/mitpress/10648.003.0017 · DOI
- 10.1111/hcre.12123 · DOI
- 10.1177/0093650212467031 · DOI
- Lepisto Douglas A., 2015, International Handbook of Professional Identities, 11
- 10.1080/21670811.2014.927986 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2014.976418 · DOI
- Lowrey Wilson, 2011, Changing the News: The Forces Shaping Journalism in Uncertain times
- 10.1177/107769901008700103 · DOI
- 10.1080/14616700601148879 · DOI
- 10.1080/15205436.2010.491934 · DOI
- 10.2307/256809 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/soc4.12376 · DOI
- 10.1108/02634500410516904 · DOI
- Nadler Anthony M., 2016, Making the News Popular: Mobilizing US News Audiences, 10.5406/illinois/9780252040146.001.0001 · DOI
- Napoli Philip M., 2011, Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences
- Nguyen An, 2013, Journalism: New Challenges, 146
- Petre Caitlin, 2015, The Traffic Factories: Metrics at Chartbeat, Gawker Media, and the New York times
- 10.1177/030631284014003004 · DOI · Paper page
- Schlesinger Philip, 1978, Putting “Reality” Together: BBC News
- 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01408.x · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444814530541 · DOI
- 10.1080/1461670X.2014.946309 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.027 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2014.909122 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002716204270469 · DOI
- Usher Nikki, 2012, International Journal of Communication, 6, 1898
- 10.1080/21670811.2013.801690 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884913504259 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884915595474 · DOI
- Wildman Steven S., 2006, Handbook of Media Management and Economics, 67
- 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1262215 · DOI
- 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1146083 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077699017714223 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zamith, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zamith, Rodrigo
- ORCID
- Zamith, Rodrigo
- Venue
- Digital Journalism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 418-435
- ISSN
- 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-082X
- OpenAlex
- W2792222873
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 50.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digital Journalism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- audience analytics, audience metrics, quantification, news production, audience understanding, journalism ethics, audience behavior, audience attitudes, audience discourse, news content
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantified Audiences in News Production: A synthesis and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21670811.2018.1444999
- The paper
- Zamith, R. (2018). Quantified Audiences in News Production: A synthesis and research agenda. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1444999