The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Key Dimensions of Alternative News Media
Open accessAbstract
This article proposes a definition of alternative news media and suggests routes for further research. It complements and extends previous conceptualizations in research on alternative media and outlines an umbrella definition of this phenomenon aimed to inspire contemporary research and scholarly debate. Previous research has been guided by a “progressive” perspective as a form of resistance against “bourgeois” hegemonic discourse. Such normative evaluations have in turn limited how the phenomenon has been studied empirically, by limiting the scope of research so that important contemporary phenomena fall outside the theoretical map. Conceptualizing alternative news media in the present hybrid and polarized media environment, we first propose a non-normative, multilevel relational definition: Alternative news media position themselves as correctives of the mainstream news media, as expressed in editorial agendas or statements and/or are perceived as such by their audiences or third-parties. This counter-hegemonic alternativeness can emerge on the macro-level of societal function, the meso-level of organizations and/or the micro-level of news content and producers. Second, demonstrating why this umbrella definition is fruitful in the changing media environment characterized by boundary struggles, crisis in legacy news media and mushrooming of alternative news outlets, we highlight research gaps and propose future research.CONCEPT DEFINITION: Alternative News Media
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
Chadwick, A. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001 · Cited by 1,550
Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements
Downing, J. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9781452204994 · Cited by 1,184
The "Uncensored War": The Media and Vietnam.
Duiker, W. J., & Hallin, D. C. (1987) · Pacific Affairs · doi:10.2307/2758182 · Cited by 950
The hybrid media system: politics and power
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-6974 · Cited by 841
Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1995) · Cited by 749
Atton, C. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446220153 · Cited by 652
New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere
Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444803005002003 · Cited by 494
Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures Around the Globe
(2019) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/hani18642 · Cited by 405
Understanding Alternative Media
Bailey, O. G., Cammaerts, B., & Carpentier, N. (2007) · Cited by 340
The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media
(2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315717241 · Cited by 316
Cited by
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015
Newman, N., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2619576 · Cited by 1,890
Boberg, S., Quandt, T., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Frischlich, L. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02566 · Cited by 141
Self-citationWho Uses Right-Wing Alternative Online Media? An Exploration of Audience Characteristics
Schulze, H. (2020) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925 · Cited by 81
Between Mainstream and Alternative – Co-orientation in Right-Wing Populist Alternative News Media
Frischlich, L., Klapproth, J., & Brinkschulte, F. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_12 · Cited by 57
Self-citationAlternative Counter-News Use and Fake News Recall During the COVID-19 Crisis
Frischlich, L., Kuhfeldt, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Clever, L. (2023) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Holt, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Frischlich, L.
- Venue
- Digital Journalism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-06-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 860-869
- ISSN
- 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-082X
- OpenAlex
- W2952885226
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 95.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key Dimensions of Alternative News Media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715
- The paper
- Holt, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key Dimensions of Alternative News Media. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.