Cited by 234Journalism and Media StudiesMedia Studies and CommunicationStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Online Harassment and Its Implications for the Journalist–Audience Relationship

Lewis, Seth C., Zamith, Rodrigo, Coddington, Mark·2020·Digital Journalism

Abstract

Seth C. Lewisa* , Rodrigo Zamithb & Mark Coddingtonc a School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USAb Department of Journalism, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USAc Department of Journalism and Mass Communications, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA, USACONTACT Seth C. Lewis sclewis@uoregon.eduSupplemental data for this article can be accessed here.AbstractAmid growing threats to journalists around the world, this study examines the nature of online harassment, the types of journalists most likely to experience it, and the most common forms of response to such abuse. Through a representative survey of U.S. journalists, we find that nearly all journalists experience at least some online harassment but that such harassment is generally infrequent overall and especially in its most severe forms. Nevertheless, online harassment against journalists disproportionately affects women (particularly young women) and those who are more personally visible in the news but not necessarily those who work for larger newsrooms. Moreover, it is clear that the more often a journalist is harassed online, the more likely they are to take a dim view of the audience by seeing them as irrational and unlike themselves, and to perceive interaction with them as less valuable. Additionally, as greater targets of the worst forms of abuse, women face a greater burden in deciding if and how to respond to online harassment. Conceptually, this artic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21670811.2020.1811743

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior research has largely focused on defining the nature of harassment, who is most at risk, how harassment affects journalists' work, and coping strategies.

    “To date these concerns have largely focused on defining the nature of the harassment (Miller, 2023), who is most at risk (Adams, 2018; Jane, 2018; Miller & Lewis, 2022; Tandoc et al., 2023), how harassment affects the way journalists work (Lewis et al., 2020) and the coping strategies used by to mitigate threats and the deleterious consequences of this (Harlow et al., 2023).”
  • A large segment of the journalism literature reveals the vulnerability of women, and particularly young women, to harassment.

    “A large segment of the journalism literature reveals the vulnerability of women (Adams, 2018; Claesson, 2022; Jane, 2018; Lee & Park, 2024; Sampaio-Dias et al., 2023; Tandoc et al., 2023), and particularly young women (Lewis et al., 2020), to harassment.”
  • The Online Harassment scale model found is in line with the proposal of the original authors.

    “Relatively to the Online Harassment scale model found, it is in line with the proposal of the original authors [52].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, S. C., Zamith, R., & Coddington, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Washington and Lee University (US)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Seth C.
Venue
Digital Journalism
Published
2020-09-11
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
1047-1067
ISSN
  • 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-082X
OpenAlex
W3085817595
Cited by
234
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
38.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Digital Journalism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
online harassment, journalists, journalist-audience relationship, audience perception, gender differences, women journalists, young women, threats against journalists, audience interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review