The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
A Global Perspective on Data Journalism Materiality: Knowledge Production across Public Transparency Infrastructure Environments
Abstract
It is widely accepted that data materiality serves as the breeding ground of data journalism’s performativity, in some cases functioning as the sole ingredient for news construction. Material identity is closely tied to the historical process that originated it, yet few studies have explored how unequal public policies on government transparency affect news production in data journalism. We bring in a fresh perspective on materiality that taps into research on public transparency to offer a framework for understanding how external social actors influence data knowledge construction. This study analyzed data journalism project entries in the Global Editors Network (GEN) and Sigma Awards from 61 countries to explore data journalism process and products across transparency environments. Results suggest that journalists operating in open data infrastructure are more likely to exhibit a dependency on preprocessed public data and their output exhibits topical diversity, while journalists operating in closed data infrastructures are more likely to use Right to Information legislation and alternative data sources. This study informs the debate on the empiricism of data journalism in knowledge construction, emphasizing how data access (or lack of access) affects not only journalistic epistemology but also power relationships and journalistic roles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1177/1461444812465137 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2019.1685899 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884914545734 · DOI
- 10.1080/17512786.2016.1159921 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884917693864 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2022.2077786 · DOI
- 10.1080/1461670X.2022.2094822 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2014.976400 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2014.928021 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884914545738 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884915593246 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884913486393 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2016.1162663 · DOI
- 10.15353/joci.v8i2.3042 · DOI
- 10.1080/17512786.2013.813190 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884914545732 · DOI
- 10.4018/978-1-5225-4987-1 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884914550972 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2014.976418 · DOI
- 10.1177/1748048518759194 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884917735691 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884918767577 · DOI
- 10.1080/17512786.2022.2142837 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884920985730 · DOI
- Noveck, B. S. 2017. “Rights-Based and Tech-Driven: Open Data, Freedom of Information, and the Future of Government Transparency.” Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 19 (1): 1–45.
- 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934788 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2017.1403291 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2014.976408 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444812463345 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2019.1657778 · DOI
- 10.1177/14614448221150439 · DOI
- 10.1177/1527476419831640 · DOI
- Samaha, A. M. 2005. “Government Secrets, Constitutional Law, and Platforms for Judicial Intervention.” UCLA Law Review 53 (4): 909–976.
- 10.1111/soc4.12738 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884916657517 · DOI
- 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1104260 · DOI
- 10.1080/17512786.2019.1698974 · DOI
- 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1375391 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2021.1893199 · DOI
- 10.1080/17512786.2016.1270171 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.2012489 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2018.1554409 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sulistiani, I., Caroline, C., & Syarifuddin (2025) · MORFAI JOURNAL · doi:10.54443/morfai.v5i1.2544 · Cited by 3
“( Camaj et al., 2023).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Camaj, L., Lanosga, G., & Martin, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Houston (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- DePaul University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Camaj, Lindita
- Venue
- Digital Journalism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-11-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 418-437
- ISSN
- 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-082X
- OpenAlex
- W4388733992
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digital Journalism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
- Keywords
- data journalism, public transparency, open data infrastructure, right to information, data access, knowledge production, data dependencies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Global Perspective on Data Journalism Materiality: Knowledge Production across Public Transparency Infrastructure Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21670811.2023.2278040
- The paper
- Camaj, L., Lanosga, G., & Martin, J. (2025). A Global Perspective on Data Journalism Materiality: Knowledge Production across Public Transparency Infrastructure Environments. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2278040