Cited by 3News Media Framing and Political CommunicationJournalism and Media StudiesLiterature, Film, and Journalism Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

A Global Perspective on Data Journalism Materiality: Knowledge Production across Public Transparency Infrastructure Environments

Camaj, Lindita, Lanosga, Gerry, Martin, Jason·2025·Digital Journalism

Abstract

It is widely accepted that data materiality serves as the breeding ground of data journalism’s performativity, in some cases functioning as the sole ingredient for news construction. Material identity is closely tied to the historical process that originated it, yet few studies have explored how unequal public policies on government transparency affect news production in data journalism. We bring in a fresh perspective on materiality that taps into research on public transparency to offer a framework for understanding how external social actors influence data knowledge construction. This study analyzed data journalism project entries in the Global Editors Network (GEN) and Sigma Awards from 61 countries to explore data journalism process and products across transparency environments. Results suggest that journalists operating in open data infrastructure are more likely to exhibit a dependency on preprocessed public data and their output exhibits topical diversity, while journalists operating in closed data infrastructures are more likely to use Right to Information legislation and alternative data sources. This study informs the debate on the empiricism of data journalism in knowledge construction, emphasizing how data access (or lack of access) affects not only journalistic epistemology but also power relationships and journalistic roles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21670811.2023.2278040

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1177/1461444812465137 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/21670811.2019.1685899 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/1464884914545734 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/17512786.2016.1159921 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1464884917693864 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/21670811.2022.2077786 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/1461670X.2022.2094822 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/21670811.2014.976400 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/21670811.2014.928021 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1464884914545738 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/1464884915593246 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/1464884913486393 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/21670811.2016.1162663 · DOI
  14. 10.15353/joci.v8i2.3042 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/17512786.2013.813190 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/1464884914545732 · DOI
  17. 10.4018/978-1-5225-4987-1 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/1464884914550972 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/21670811.2014.976418 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1748048518759194 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1464884917735691 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1464884918767577 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/17512786.2022.2142837 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/1464884920985730 · DOI
  25. Noveck, B. S. 2017. “Rights-Based and Tech-Driven: Open Data, Freedom of Information, and the Future of Government Transparency.” Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 19 (1): 1–45.
  26. 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934788 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/21670811.2017.1403291 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/21670811.2014.976408 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1461444812463345 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/21670811.2019.1657778 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/14614448221150439 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/1527476419831640 · DOI
  33. Samaha, A. M. 2005. “Government Secrets, Constitutional Law, and Platforms for Judicial Intervention.” UCLA Law Review 53 (4): 909–976.
  34. 10.1111/soc4.12738 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/1464884916657517 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1104260 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/17512786.2019.1698974 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1375391 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/21670811.2021.1893199 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/17512786.2016.1270171 · DOI
  41. 10.2139/ssrn.2012489 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/21670811.2018.1554409 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Camaj, L., Lanosga, G., & Martin, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • DePaul University (US)
Corresponding author
Camaj, Lindita
Venue
Digital Journalism
Published
2023-11-16
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
418-437
ISSN
  • 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-082X
OpenAlex
W4388733992
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Digital Journalism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
Keywords
data journalism, public transparency, open data infrastructure, right to information, data access, knowledge production, data dependencies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Global Perspective on Data Journalism Materiality: Knowledge Production across Public Transparency Infrastructure Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21670811.2023.2278040
The paper
Camaj, L., Lanosga, G., & Martin, J. (2025). A Global Perspective on Data Journalism Materiality: Knowledge Production across Public Transparency Infrastructure Environments. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2278040