Male infertility problems of patients with strict sperm morphology between 5–14% may be missed with the current WHO guidelines
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: percentile cut points from a meta-analysis on a published series of fertile men. This study investigates if patients referred for evaluation with sperm morphologies between 5-14% have identifiable etiologies of male infertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: I.R.B. approval was obtained to review records for patients referred to the University of Michigan Center of Reproductive Medicine between May 2012-May 2014 whom had a sperm morphology of 5-14%. Semen analysis, hormone levels, and information related to an infertility diagnosis, were recorded into a de-identified database. Patients were placed into the categories 'Varicocele', 'Hypogonadism', 'Intercourse problems', 'Anti-sperm antibodies (A.S.A.)', 'Other' or 'No diagnosis'. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were included in the study. Of these, 96/253 (38%) had a clinical varicocele; 44/253 (17%) hypogonadism; 4/253 (2%) intercourse problems; 11/253 (4%) evidence of sperm antibodies; and 15/253 (6%) had various other problems deemed potentially contributing causes of infertility. In all, nearly 67% of the subjects were identified to have a potential contributing etiology of male infertility. Similar results were found for the men with isolated low morphology (n = 194). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that 67% of men in infertile couples, who have strict sperm morphology between 5 and 14%, are found to have a potential contributing male factor infertility diagnosis. This raises the possibility that the new lower reference value for sperm morphology may result in missed opportunities for proper infertility assessment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is still the possibility of other contributing male infertility factors in patients with 5-14% normal sperm morphology.
“Moreover, there is still the possibility of other contributing male infertility factors in patients with 5–14% normal sperm morphology.”
From Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
The low cut-off points may have missed a proper infertility evaluation.
“Therefore, the low cut-off points may have missed a proper infertility evaluation (32).”
From Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review
Atmoko, W., Savira, M., Shah, R., Chung, E., & Agarwal, A. (2024) · Translational Andrology and Urology · doi:10.21037/tau-23-397 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Therefore, the low cut-off points may have missed a proper infertility evaluation (32).”
- Authors
- Jensen, C. F. S., Khan, O., Nagras, Z. G., Sønksen, J., Fode, M., Østergren, P. B., Shah, T., Ohl, D. A., & Collaborative, O. B. O. T. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Toledo (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Christian Fuglesang S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2018-11-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 427-431
- ISSN
- 2168-1805 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-1813
- OpenAlex
- W2907043538
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- male infertility, sperm morphology, WHO reference values, varicocele, hypogonadism, antisperm antibodies, causes of infertility, infertility assessment, semen analysis
- MeSH terms
- Teratozoospermia, Adult, Humans, Hypogonadism, Infertility, Male, Male, Reference Values, Spermatozoa, Varicocele, World Health Organization, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Semen Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review