Bringing agroecology to scale: key drivers and emblematic cases
Abstract
Agroecology as a transformative movement has gained momentum in many countries worldwide. In several cases, the implementation of agroecological practices has grown beyond isolated, local experiences to be employed by ever-greater numbers of families and communities over ever-larger territories and to engage more people in the processing, distribution, and consumption of agroecologically produced food. To understand the nonlinear, multidimensional processes that have enabled and impelled the bringing to scale of agroecology, we review and analyze emblematic cases that include the farmer-to-farmer movement in Central America; the national peasant agroecology movement in Cuba; the organic coffee boom in Chiapas, Mexico; the spread of Zero Budget Natural Farming in Karnataka, India; and the agroecological farmer–consumer marketing network “Rede Ecovida,” in Brazil. On the basis of our analysis, we identify eight key drivers of the process of taking agroecology to scale: (1) recognition of a crisis that motivates the search for alternatives, (2) social organization, (3) constructivist learning processes, (4) effective agroecological practices, (5) mobilizing discourses, (6) external allies, (7) favorable markets, and (8) favorable policies. This initial analysis shows that organization and social fabric are the growth media on which agroecology advances, with the help of the other drivers. A more detailed understanding is needed on how these multiple dimensions interact with, rei…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transformation of agri-food systems is urgently needed to face current global crises.
“Transformation of agri-food systems is urgently needed to face current global crises (Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho et al. 2018, Egmose et al. 2021, Giller et al. 2021).”
From A heuristic framework to portray agroecological transition initiatives in reflexive arrangements, illustrated with a conservation agriculture network in Denmark (2025) · cites this paper as Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho et al. 2018
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 76 · Cited by 413
- Authors
- Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho, M., Giraldo, O. F., Aldasoro, M., Morales, H., Ferguson, B. G., Rosset, P., Khadse, A., & Campos, C.
- Affiliations
- El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (MX)
- Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 637-665
- ISSN
- 2168-3565 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-3573
- OpenAlex
- W2792654460
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 11
- FWCI
- 89.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
- Social Sciences › Education › Rural and Ethnic Education
- Keywords
- agroecology, scale-up, peasant movements, organic coffee, zero budget natural farming, social organization, constructivist learning, agroecological policy, agroecological markets, Central America, Cuba, Chiapas, Karnataka, Brazil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review