Cited by 413Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentRural Development and AgricultureRural and Ethnic Education

Bringing agroecology to scale: key drivers and emblematic cases

Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho, Mateo, Giraldo, Omar Felipe, Aldasoro, Miriam, Morales, Helda, Ferguson, Bruce G., Rosset, Peter, Khadse, Ashlesha, Campos, Carmen·2018·Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems

Abstract

Agroecology as a transformative movement has gained momentum in many countries worldwide. In several cases, the implementation of agroecological practices has grown beyond isolated, local experiences to be employed by ever-greater numbers of families and communities over ever-larger territories and to engage more people in the processing, distribution, and consumption of agroecologically produced food. To understand the nonlinear, multidimensional processes that have enabled and impelled the bringing to scale of agroecology, we review and analyze emblematic cases that include the farmer-to-farmer movement in Central America; the national peasant agroecology movement in Cuba; the organic coffee boom in Chiapas, Mexico; the spread of Zero Budget Natural Farming in Karnataka, India; and the agroecological farmer–consumer marketing network “Rede Ecovida,” in Brazil. On the basis of our analysis, we identify eight key drivers of the process of taking agroecology to scale: (1) recognition of a crisis that motivates the search for alternatives, (2) social organization, (3) constructivist learning processes, (4) effective agroecological practices, (5) mobilizing discourses, (6) external allies, (7) favorable markets, and (8) favorable policies. This initial analysis shows that organization and social fabric are the growth media on which agroecology advances, with the help of the other drivers. A more detailed understanding is needed on how these multiple dimensions interact with, rei…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21683565.2018.1443313

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 76 · Cited by 413

Authors
Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho, M., Giraldo, O. F., Aldasoro, M., Morales, H., Ferguson, B. G., Rosset, P., Khadse, A., & Campos, C.
Affiliations
  • El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (MX)
  • Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
Venue
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2018-03-09
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
637-665
ISSN
  • 2168-3565 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-3573
OpenAlex
W2792654460
Cited by
413
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 11
FWCI
89.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Education › Rural and Ethnic Education
Keywords
agroecology, scale-up, peasant movements, organic coffee, zero budget natural farming, social organization, constructivist learning, agroecological policy, agroecological markets, Central America, Cuba, Chiapas, Karnataka, Brazil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review