A host–gut microbial amino acid co-metabolite, p -cresol glucuronide, promotes blood–brain barrier integrity in vivo
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The sequential activity of gut microbial and host processes can exert a powerful modulatory influence on dietary components, as exemplified by the metabolism of the amino acids tyrosine and phenylalanine to p-cresol by gut microbes, and then to p-cresol glucuronide (pCG) by host enzymes. Although such glucuronide conjugates are classically thought to be biologically inert, there is accumulating evidence that this may not always be the case. We investigated the activity of pCG, studying its interactions with the cerebral vasculature and the brain in vitro and in vivo. Male C57Bl/6 J mice were used to assess blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability and whole-brain transcriptomic changes in response to pCG treatment. Effects were then further explored using the human cerebromicrovascular endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3, assessing paracellular permeability, transendothelial electrical resistance and barrier protein expression. Mice exposed to pCG showed reduced BBB permeability and significant changes in whole-brain transcriptome expression. Surprisingly, treatment of hCMEC/D3 cells with pCG had no notable effects until co-administered with bacterial lipopolysaccharide, at which point it was able to prevent the permeabilizing effects of endotoxin. Further analysis suggested that pCG acts as an antagonist at the principal lipopolysaccharide receptor TLR4. The amino acid phase II metabolic product pCG is biologically active at the BBB, antagonizing the effects of constitutively circulating lipopolysaccharide. These data add to the growing literature showing glucuronide conjugates to be more than merely metabolic waste products and highlight the complexity of gut microbe to host communication pathways underlying the gut–brain axis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gut microbiota-derived metabolites are important regulators of BBB integrity.
“Ample evidence has shown that gut microbiota-derived metabolites are important regulators of BBB integrity”
From Microbiota–gut–brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [664]
In hCMEC/D3 cells, pCG counteracted the permeabilizing effects of LPS by inhibiting the TLR4 signaling.
“pCG counteracted the permeabilizing effects of LPS by inhibiting the TLR4 signaling.”
From Microbiota–gut–brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [664]
pCG treatment improved the BBB integrity of male C57Bl/6 mice by upregulating several transporter-related pathways and downregulating inflammatory pathways.
“pCG treatment improved the BBB integrity of male C57Bl/6 mice by upregulating several transporter-related pathways and downregulating inflammatory pathways.”
From Microbiota–gut–brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases (2024) · cites this paper as [664]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Stachulski, A. V., Knausenberger, T. B.-A., Shah, S. N., Hoyles, L., & McArthur, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Nottingham Trent University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stachulski, Andrew V.
- Hoyles, Lesley
- McArthur, Simon
- Venue
- Tissue Barriers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-20
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2073175-2073175
- ISSN
- 2168-8362 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-8370
- PMC
- PMC9870004
- OpenAlex
- W4281261974
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Tissue Barriers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (874583)
- Medical Research Council (MR/L01632X/1)
- Alzheimer’s Research UK (ARUK-PPG2016B-6)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- blood-brain barrier integrity, gut microbiota, amino acid metabolism, glucuronide conjugates, lipopolysaccharide, TLR4 antagonism, brain transcriptome, gut-brain axis, host-microbe communication
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Amino Acids, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Cresols, Humans, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Glucuronides, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review