The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resilience and abandonment
Abstract
Resilient life: The art of living dangerously is an important work, not only for its penetrating critique of resilience thinking, but more fundamentally, for its bravery and optimism. It is a book ...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Accordingly, the narrative around refugees has largely abandoned their characterisation as passive aid victims, instead constructing them as 'the lean, agile and adaptive subject that [….] thrives in the fitness landscapes of permanent emergency' (Duffield 2015:139, emphasis in the original).”
From Throwing therapy at the problem mental health and humanitarian intervention in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda (2023) · cites this paper as Duffield 2015
In the citing paper
“Duffield (2015) has argued that resilience-focused policies lay the ground for states' abandonment of citizens.”
From Throwing therapy at the problem mental health and humanitarian intervention in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda (2023) · cites this paper as Duffield 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Torre, C. (2023) · London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) · doi:10.21953/lse.00004557
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffield, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Duffield, Mark
- ORCID
- Duffield, Mark
- Venue
- Resilience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-04-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-140
- ISSN
- 2169-3293 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-3307
- OpenAlex
- W2013776729
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resilience (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
- Keywords
- resilience thinking, abandonment, optimism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resilience and abandonment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21693293.2015.1022990
- The paper
- Duffield, M. (2015). Resilience and abandonment. Resilience. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2015.1022990
