Estimating passenger numbers in trains using existing weighing capabilities
Abstract
Knowing passenger numbers is important for the planning and operation of the urban rail systems. Manual and electronic counting systems (typically infrared or video) are expensive and therefore entail small sample sizes. They usually count boarding and alighting passengers, which means that errors in estimates of total numbers of passengers propagate along train runs. Counting errors in manual and electronic counting systems are typically flow-dependent, making uncertainty a function of volume. This paper presents a new counting technique that exploits the weighing systems installed in most modern trains to control braking. This technique makes passenger counting cheaper and ensures a complete sample. The paper compares numbers estimated by this technique with manual counts and counts from an infrared system in trains in urban Copenhagen. It shows that the weighing system provides more accurate passenger counts than the infrared equipment. The method has been validated on a large data set and is now in full operation in the urban Copenhagen rail system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Nielsen, B. F., Frølich, L., Nielsen, O. A., & Filges, D.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Nielsen, Bo Friis
- Venue
- Transportmetrica A: Transport Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-06-25
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 502-517
- ISSN
- 2324-9935 (ISSN-L)
- 2324-9943
- OpenAlex
- W2091251427
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportmetrica A Transport Science (publishedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Transport Systems and Technology
- Keywords
- passenger counting, urban rail transit, counting errors, urban rail planning, Copenhagen Metro
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review