Globalization, populism, and climate skepticism: untangling varieties and pathways
Abstract
Drawing upon cross-national data collected by the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) across 26 nations and over 28,000 individuals, this study explores the association between climate skepticism and populism, both in general, and amidst varying degrees of neoliberal globalization. Distinguishing between populism’s ideological varieties and pathways of influence, we find that right-wing and valence forms of populism are linked to greater skepticism, and left-wing populism to lower skepticism. Crucially, the impact of populism occurs both at the country level and at the individual level, indicating support for theories anticipating both top-down and bottom-up mechanisms of populist influence. We also find that the link between populism and climate skepticism depends on the level of globalization – albeit in diverse and sometimes unexpected ways, reflecting the pathway and ideology in question. These insights advance ongoing debates arguing that populism is neither inherently exclusionary or right-wing, and its diverse forms warrant further exploration. Future research can expand data collection on populism’s ideological variations and investigate how populist dynamics intersect with globalization, particularly its neoliberal variant, to shape climate attitudes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Institutional governance and socio-cultural influences collectively determine audience perceptions of trust and skepticism regarding sustainability messages; however, evidence specific to influencers remains limited.
“Cross-national research indicates that institutional governance and socio-cultural influences collectively determine audience perceptions of trust and skepticism regarding sustainability messages; however, evidence specific to influencers remains limited (Colleoni et al., 2022;Kim et al., 2025;Strycharz and Segijn, 2024).”
From Cross-national evidence on influencer-driven green choice: a moderated-mediation model of authenticity, parasocial ties, and greenwashing exposure (2026) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2025
Cites
Data with Hierarchical Structure: Impact of Intraclass Correlation and Sample Size on Type-I Error
Musca, S. C., Kamiejski, R., Nugier, A., Méot, A., Er-Rafiy, A., & Brauer, M. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00074 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Populism and Democratic Theory
Mansbridge, J., & Macedo, S. (2019) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Balaskas, S., & Yfantidou, I. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1764803 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“We further employ PGE as a person-level moderator and set trait-like skepticism (PGE) apart from state-like message suspicion (PGR), enabling us to establish a dual-skepticism account (Higueras-Castillo et al., 2024; Kim et al., 2025).”
Influential
- Authors
- Kim, J., Henry, E. A., Carter, J., & Soysal, Y. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- WZB Berlin Social Science Center (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Jessica
- Venue
- Environmental Sociology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-08-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-260
- ISSN
- 2325-1042 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4412933439
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2025-08-25)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
- Keywords
- climate change skepticism, populism, neoliberal globalization, right-wing populism, left-wing populism, climate attitudes, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review