The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of education quality: what makes students’ perception different?
Open accessAbstract
In recent decades, the commercialization of education has become more apparent and the need for using marketing tools is greater than before. This study aims to identify the demographic and background information of students that differentiate their perception about quality of higher education. A sample of 432 students was taken from five top private universities of Bangladesh to evaluate their perception toward dimensions of higher education. Multinomial regression analysis was conducted to identify the characteristics of students which make their perception about quality of higher education dissimilar. The findings show that status of students for scholarship, extracurricular activities, parents’ education, age, previous result, and university they study in have a significant influence on perception about quality of higher education. Part-time job status has moderate influence on the students’ perception. This research carries value to education policy-makers and university authorities. They can use these findings to formulate regulations, and target specific groups of students to ensure favorable academic environment and increase the brand image of their institutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10073 · Cited by 5,916
Scientific method: Statistical errors
Nuzzo, R. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/506150a · Cited by 1,536
Cited by
Indonesia Education Readiness Conducting Distance Learning in Covid-19 Pandemic Situation
Churiyah, M., Sholikhan, S., Filianti, F., & Sakdiyyah, D. A. (2020) · International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding · doi:10.18415/ijmmu.v7i6.1833 · Cited by 369
Learning Analytics Lens: Improving Quality of Higher Education
Hooda, M. (2020) · International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research · doi:10.30534/ijeter/2020/24852020 · Cited by 30
Delgado-Floody, P., Carter-Thuillier, B., Guzmán-Guzmán, I. P., Latorrre-Román, P., & Caamaño-Navarrete, F. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101651 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Akareem, H. S., & Hossain, S. S.
- Venue
- Open Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-67
- ISSN
- 2326-5507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2341250707
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 57.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of education quality: what makes students’ perception different? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/23265507.2016.1155167
- The paper
- Akareem, H. S., & Hossain, S. S. (2016). Determinants of education quality: what makes students’ perception different? Open Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2016.1155167
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.