The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Values in responsible research and innovation: from entities to practices
Open accessAbstract
This article explores the understanding of values in Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). First, it analyses how two mainstream RRI approaches, the largely substantial one by Von Schomberg and the procedural one by Stilgoe and colleagues, identify and conceptualize values. We argue that by treating values as relatively stable entities, directly available for reflection, both fall into an ‘entity trap’. As a result, the hermeneutic work required to identify values is overlooked. We therefore seek to bolster a practice-based take on values, which approaches values as the evolving results of valuing processes. We highlight how this approach views values as lived realities, interactive and dynamic, discuss methodological implications for RRI, and explore potential limitations. Overall, the strength of this approach is that it enables RRI scholars and practitioners to better acknowledge the complexities involved in valuing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These criteria, subsequently coined as “normative anchor points” (Boenink & Kudina, 2020) can be operationalized in alignment with the European Union declaration on human rights and include the public values of safety, privacy, sustainability, quality of life, and gender equality (Von Schomberg, 2011, p. 9-10).”
From Navigating the perils of artificial intelligence: a focused review on ChatGPT and responsible research and innovation (2024) · cites this paper as Boenink & Kudina, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453
Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing
Reckwitz, A. (2002) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/13684310222225432 · Cited by 5,544
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., et al. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 · Cited by 4,774
The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice
Mol, A. (2002) · doi:10.1215/9780822384151 · Cited by 4,381
Wittgenstein, L., Hacker, P. M. S. 1., & Schulte, J. (1968) · Cited by 4,111
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 3,184
Gummett, P. J. (1988) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/39/8/019 · Cited by 2,997
Dewey, J. (1929) · W W Norton & Co eBooks · doi:10.1037/13377-000 · Cited by 2,892
Interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Smith, J. A., & Shinebourne, P. (2012) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13620-005 · Cited by 1,755
Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things
de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2010) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312710380301 · Cited by 1,635
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bolt I., 2003, Ethiek in praktijk
- Dewey J., 1930, The Quest for Certainty
- The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union . 2013. “Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of The European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC.” Official Journal of the European Union, L 347/104 (En), December 11.
- Gadamer H.-G., 1975, Truth and Method
- Kennedy J., 2002, Een weloverwogen dood. De opkomst van de euthanasie in Nederland
- Pols A. J., 2014, Moral Boundaries Redrawn. The Significance of Joan Tronto’s Argument for Political Theory, Professional Ethics, and Care Practice
- Schroeder M., 2016, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holter, C. T., Inglesant, P., & Jirotka, M. D. (2021) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2021.1988070 · Cited by 89
Polyportis, A., & Pahos, N. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02464-6 · Cited by 64
Participatory design: lessons and directions for responsible research and innovation
Holter, C. T. (2022) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2041801 · Cited by 59
Key value indicators: A framework for values-driven next-generation ICT solutions
Wikström, G., Bledow, N., Matinmikko‐Blue, M., Breuer, H., Costa, C., Darzanos, G., Gavras, A., Hoßfeld, T., Mesogiti, I., Petersen, K., et al. (2024) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102778 · Cited by 41
Responsible innovation scholarship: normative, empirical, theoretical, and engaged
Fisher, E., Smolka, M., Owen, R., Pansera, M., Guston, D. H., Grünwald, A., Nelson, J. P., Raman, S., Neudert, P., Flipse, S. M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2024.2309060 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Boenink, M., & Kudina, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Twente (NL)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Boenink, Marianne
- Venue
- Journal of Responsible Innovation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-08-23
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 450-470
- ISSN
- 2329-9037 (ISSN-L)
- 2329-9460
- OpenAlex
- W3080237179
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 18.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Responsible Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (313 99 309)
- European Research Council (788321)
- Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (277-20-006)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Education, Technology, and Ethics
- Keywords
- responsible research and innovation, values, practice-oriented approach, hermeneutics, methodological implications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
