Cited by 29Educational and Psychological AssessmentsEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and Feedback

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing EFL learners’ speaking skills through dynamic assessment: A case of a beginner and an advanced learner

Open access
Ebadi, Saman, Asakereh, Ahmad·2017·Cogent Education

Abstract

Dynamic assessment (DA), having its theoretical base in Vygotskyan Sociocultural theory of mind, is a newly developed classroom assessment through which learners are helped to perform beyond their current ability. Drawing upon the theoretical aspect of DA, the present study explored the impact of DA on the development of speaking skills. To this end, a beginner and an advanced English language learner were recruited for the present study. To collect the data, the participants narrated a set of picture stories during which they received mediation based on their Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Microgenetic and thematic analysis as a data analysis framework was employed to identify any possible changes in the participants’ cognition development. Moreover, the participants’ private speech was considered as an index of their movement toward self-regulation. The findings revealed a significant development in the participants’ cognition and their movement toward further self-regulation. Furthermore, the results of thematic analysis of unstructured interviews showed their satisfaction with DA. The findings of the study call for teachers’ and materials developers’ attention to learners’ individualized needs which require tailored mediation to help them move forward toward further self-regulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2331186x.2017.1419796

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Ahmadi Safa M., 2016, Journal Teaching English Language, 9, 153
  2. 10.1111/modl.1994.78.issue-4 · DOI
  3. Antón M., 2009, Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners
  4. 10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00238.x · DOI
  5. Brown H. D., 2001, Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy
  6. Bygate M., 1987, Speaking: The Cambridge guide to teaching speaking to speakers of other languages
  7. Catalán R. J., 1996, Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 17, 171, 10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199611043 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/ijal.2004.14.issue-1 · DOI
  9. Charmaz K., 2006, Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis
  10. 10.1177/1362168816654309 · DOI
  11. Ebadi S., 2014, Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 49
  12. Ebadi S., 2016, CALL-EJ, 17, 18
  13. 10.1007/978-1-4899-6128-0 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/applin/6.1.19 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/2229-0443-4-4 · DOI
  16. 10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_5 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00251.x · DOI
  18. 10.1080/14417040701460390 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/lang.1974.24.issue-2 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/0969594X.2010.526586 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/0143034302023001733 · DOI
  22. Krashen S., 2014, Case histories and the comprehension hypothesis
  23. 10.1017/S0261444800015329 · DOI
  24. Lantolf J., 2006, Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development
  25. Lazarton A., 2001, Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 103
  26. 10.1080/15434300701481127 · DOI
  27. Lidz C., 1991, Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment
  28. 10.1111/modl.1992.76.issue-2 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/modl.1994.78.issue-4 · DOI
  30. 10.4324/9781410604712 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/modl.2007.91.issue-3 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/978-0-387-75775-9 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/tesq.308 · DOI
  34. Poehner M. E., 2003, Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future
  35. 10.1080/09571736.2017.1343863 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1242459 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.003 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/026553220101800302 · DOI
  39. Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes
  40. Vygotsky L. S., 1986, Thought and language
  41. 10.1007/978-3-642-38339-7_1 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ebadi, S., & Asakereh, A.
Affiliations
Razi University (IR)
Corresponding author
Ebadi, Saman
Venue
Cogent Education
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1419796
ISSN
2331-186X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2778920544
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cogent Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
dynamic assessment, speaking skills, EFL learners, zone of proximal development, mediation (cultural/media theory), private speech, self-regulation, personalized learning, student satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review