The impact of morphological instruction on morphological awareness and reading comprehension of EFL learners
Open accessAbstract
Awareness in derivational morphology is the ability to manipulate derived words, recognize relationships between different morphological forms of a word, and produce new derivations of words. The current study attempted to investigate the impact of morphological instruction on awareness in relational, syntactic and distributional aspects of derivational morphology, and in turn its effects on reading comprehension among intermediate EFL learners. The participants were 129 lower–higher intermediate students, randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. The study had a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental control group design. The results demonstrated that the experimental groups outperformed the control groups on all three tasks assessing aspects of derivational morphology and reading comprehension tests demonstrating the positive effects of morphological instruction. The treatment benefited the higher level to a greater degree in reading comprehension, but concerning aspects of derivational morphology, the lower level had better improvements. It is concluded that the treatment is more effective for lower levels of proficiency at sub-lexical, but concerning higher levels of proficiency, it is more beneficial at supra-lexical level. The results also demonstrate that reading comprehension is correlated with aspects of derivational morphology and the strongest correlation was observed with distributional aspect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Explicit instruction of morphology positively affects the acquisition of L2 English words.
“Explicit instruction of morphology positively affects the acquisition of L2 English words (Crosson et al. 2019;Amirjalili and Jabbari, 2018).”
From Transformative impacts of explicit morphological instruction on irregular inflectional acquisition in Saudi EFL learners (2024) · cites this paper as Amirjalili and Jabbari, 2018
Cronbach's alpha validates the data, particularly quasi-experimental pretest and posttest analysis in the morphological acquisition of foreign language learning.
“Cronbach's alpha validates the data, particularly quasi-experimental pretest and posttest analysis in the morphological acquisition of foreign language learning (Amirjalili and Jabbari, 2018).”
From Transformative impacts of explicit morphological instruction on irregular inflectional acquisition in Saudi EFL learners (2024) · cites this paper as Amirjalili and Jabbari, 2018
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 62 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Amirjalili, F., & Jabbari, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Yazd University (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Jabbari, Ali Akbar
- Venue
- Cogent Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2331-186X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889593952
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cogent Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- morphological instruction, derivational morphology, morphological awareness, reading comprehension, EFL learners, intermediate learners, proficiency level differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review