The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this study, the authors used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist that contains 17 items (26 including sub-items) (Moher et al., 2015).”
MethodThe PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 · Cited by 11,748 · see citing works
Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From those studies, ten studies were identified using the backwards and forward snowballing methods (Wohlin, 2014).”
BackgroundSynthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987 · see citing works
Synthesizing standardized mean‐change measures
Becker, B. J. (1988) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1988.tb00901.x · Cited by 889 · see citing works
Applying the Principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in the College Classroom
Boothe, K. A., Lohmann, M. J., Donnell, K. A., & Dean Hall, D. (2018) · The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship · doi:10.58729/2167-3454.1076 · Cited by 109 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…of its nature that involves engagement and action and expression, which in turn ensures that no one is left behind and every student succeeds (Boothe et al., 2018; Rogers-Shaw et al., 2017; U.S. Department of Education, 2015), as it is evident that applying best practices instructions…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(Re)Considering Universal Design for Learning
Basham, J. D., & Lowrey, K. A. (2026) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/01626434251361443 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Vindigni, G. (2026) · European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning · doi:10.59324/ejceel.2026.4(4).05
- Authors
- Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K.
- Venue
- Cogent Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-05-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2331-186X
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Deanship of Scientific Research and Graduate Studies at Yarmouk University (81/2021)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
