Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Behavioral Threat Assessment and Equity in Exclusionary School Discipline

Cornell, Dewey G., Maeng, Jennifer, Winter, Sonja, Huang, Francis, Konold, Tim G., Kerere, Jordan, Afolabi, Kelvin, Cowley, Deanne·2026·School Psychology Review

DOI 10.1080/2372966x.2025.2457006

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2372966x.2025.2457006

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Partitioning Variation in Multilevel Models
Goldstein, H., Browne, W., & Rasbash, J. (2002) · Understanding Statistics · doi:10.1207/s15328031us0104_02 · Cited by 874
Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools?: An evidentiary review and recommendations
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.9.852 · Cited by 806 · cited 1×
“…school violence in the 1990s spurred the use of zero tolerance policies that advocated the automatic use of exclusionary discipline for students who violated a school rule, regardless of the circumstances (American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force, 2008; Johnson & Johnson, 2023).”
Toward a principled Bayesian workflow in cognitive science.
Schad, D. J., Betancourt, M., & Vasishth, S. (2021) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000275 · Cited by 252
Going Beyond Convergence in Bayesian Estimation: Why Precision Matters Too and How to Assess It
Zitzmann, S., & Hecht, M. (2019) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1545232 · Cited by 122
A Randomized Controlled Study of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines in Kindergarten Through Grade 12
Cornell, D. G., Allen, K., & Fan, X. (2012) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2012.12087378 · Cited by 106
Self-citation
The Impact of Restorative Practices on the Use of Out-of-School Suspensions: Results from a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Huang, F. L., Gregory, A., & Ward-Seidel, A. R. (2023) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-023-01507-3 · Cited by 21 · cited 1×
“Several reviews of these programs have concluded that, when properly implemented, they produce some overall reductions in exclusionary discipline, but racial disparities remain large (Huang et al., 2023; Ryberg et al., 2021; Valdebenito et al., 2018; Welsh, 2022).”
Self-citation

Research works printed but not linked: 53

10.1080/09243450802332184 · DOI
10.1177/07419325241253212 · DOI
10.1177/0013124517716260 · DOI
Balfanz, R., Byrnes, V., & Fox, J. (2014). Sent home and put off-track: The antecedents, disproportionalities, and consequences of being suspended in the ninth grade. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 5(2), 17–30.
10.3368/jhr.56.3.0118-9267R2 · DOI
10.1214/06-BA117 · DOI · Paper page
10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · DOI · Paper page
10.1037/tam0000092 · DOI
10.1037/met0000596 · DOI
Cornell, D. (2018). Comprehensive school threat assessment guidelines. School Threat Assessment Consultants LLC.
10.1177/0192636511415255 · DOI
Cornell, D., & Lovegrove, P. (2015). Student threat assessment as a method for reducing student suspensions. In D. Losen (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Research for policymakers (pp. 180–191). Teachers College Press.
Cornell, D., & Maeng, J. (2024). School threat assessment toolkit. National Center for School Safety.
10.17105/SPR-2017-0030.V47-2 · DOI
10.1037/a0016182 · DOI
Cornell, D., Kerere, J., Konold, T., Maeng, J., Afolabi, K., Huang, F., & Cowley, D. (in press a). Referral rates for school threat assessment. Psychology in the Schools.
Cornell, D., Maeng, J., Winter, S., Huang, F., Konold, T., Kerere, J., Afolabi, K., & Cowley, D. (in press b). Equity in law enforcement actions following a school threat assessment. Law and Human Behavior.
10.1080/02796015.2004.12086266 · DOI
10.1080/2372966X.2020.1842716 · DOI
10.1177/23328584211041353 · DOI
10.1016/j.irle.2015.06.001 · DOI
10.1525/collabra.94263 · DOI
Fabelo, T., Thompson, M., Plotkin, M., Carmichael, D., Marchbanks, M., III., & Booth, E. (2011). Breaking school rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. Council of State Governments Justice Center.
10.1177/1063426610392039 · DOI
10.1177/0198742916688652 · DOI
10.1214/ss/1177011136 · DOI · Paper page
10.1201/b16018 · DOI · Paper page
10.1016/j.econedurev.2022.102303 · DOI
10.1080/2372966X.2020.1861911 · DOI
10.1080/00220973.2016.1277339 · DOI
10.1080/00220671.2016.1253538 · DOI
10.1080/2372966X.2020.1832865 · DOI
10.3102/0013189X18779578 · DOI
10.1037/tam0000204 · DOI
10.1080/2331186X.2023.2179863 · DOI
10.1177/0146621619893786 · DOI
Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
10.1080/15388220.2019.1707682 · DOI
10.1037/tam0000038 · DOI
O’Toole, M. E. (2000). The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective. National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
10.2307/271063 · DOI · Paper page
10.3758/PBR.16.2.225 · DOI · Paper page
10.1016/j.jsp.2023.02.006 · DOI
10.1037/tam0000142 · DOI
10.1177/0741932513519825 · DOI
The Center for Civil Rights Remedies. (2022). K-12 threat assessment processes: Civil rights impacts. Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates.
10.4073/csr.2018.1 · DOI · Paper page
10.3758/bf03194105 · DOI · Paper page
10.1177/0895904820901481 · DOI · Paper page
10.3102/0034654318791582 · DOI
10.1177/0033294118767435 · DOI
10.1037/met0000434 · DOI
10.1111/josh.13018 · DOI

Authors: Cornell, D. G., Maeng, J., Winter, S., Huang, F., Konold, T. G., Kerere, J., Afolabi, K., & Cowley, D.
Venue: School Psychology Review
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2025-02-14
Volume: 55
Issue: 2
Pages: 241-257
ISSN: 2372-966X
DOI: 10.1080/2372966x.2025.2457006
Cited by: 7
References: 6
Language: en
Funders: National Institute of Justice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review