Cited by 16Neuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine neoplasms and related tumors: from fundamentals to personalization and the newer experimental approaches

Open access
Loharkar, Sarvesh, Basu, Sandip·2023·Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development

Abstract

Introduction Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) is a type of molecular-targeted endo-radionuclide therapy in which unsealed radiolabelled somatostatin analogues are specifically directed toward somatostatin receptors (SSTR) over-expressed in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) and related malignancies. This modality has witnessed a benchmark growth over last decade and symbolizes remarkable development in precision oncology. The tumor selectivity and excellent tolerability with minimal side effects make this one of the preferred therapeutic options in metastatic progressive NENs.Areas covered This review deliberates upon fundamentals of PRRT, its indications and employment as a therapeutic modality for precision oncology. A few special scenarios based on our experiences and expertise have also been mentioned. A short discussion on current advancements worldwide and future directions has also been included.Expert opinion SSTR-based PET and PRRT are now an established theranostic approach in management of NENs. Its spectrum has expanded in the form of Neo-Adjuvant-PRRT, Sandwich Chemo-PRRT, Duo-PRRT, Salvage-PRRT, and Intra-arterial-PRRT. Its application to other SSTR-expressing tumors includes metastatic/inoperable medullary thyroid cancer, neural crest malignancies like pheochromocytomas-paragangliomas (PPGLs), Merkel cell carcinoma, radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer, and meningiomas. Though substantial prospective evidence is still lacking, a multidisciplinary team should adopt PRRT in appropriate indications by using dual tracer PET imaging as a gatekeeper.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23808993.2023.2211090

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 146 · Cited by 16

Authors
Loharkar, S., & Basu, S.
Affiliations
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (IN)
Corresponding author
Basu, Sandip
Venue
Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development
Published
2023-05-17
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-32
ISSN
2380-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376874667
Cited by
16
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Keywords
peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, neuroendocrine neoplasms, somatostatin receptors, somatostatin analogues, precision oncology, theranostics, medullary thyroid carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, Merkel cell carcinoma, radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer, meningioma, neural crest tumors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review