Team technical performance in elite men’s and women’s T20 cricket – determinants of performance within a match and across a season
Open accessAbstract
There have been a small number of analyses of team technical performance in 20-over (T20) cricket that have identified total wickets and runs as critical determinants of match outcome. The present study aimed to extend on these findings by using a wide range of technical performance indicators, a larger sample size, a whole-of-season perspective and an analysis of women’s teams. Team technical performance in 400 and 180 innings of men’s (2017–2021) and women’s (2019–2021) T20 cricket in the professional leagues in Australia were analysed. Batting performance characteristics appear to be more important than bowling characteristics, which is even more pronounced in women’s T20 cricket. The most important bowling characteristic relate to how quickly the first 3 to 5 batters are dismissed. These determinants of match outcome also reflect the characteristics that explain whole-of-season performance. The determinants of performance in women’s T20 cricket are largely the same as in men’s, although there may be an opportunity for some women’s teams to focus on bowling performance as a decisive factor in their match strategy. The findings of this study indicate specific aspects of batting and bowling performance that can influence the goals of training and the design of match strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous performance analysis research in T20 cricket has examined performance indicators related to batting and bowling or applied machine learning techniques to predict match outcomes.
“While previous performance analysis research in T20 cricket has examined performance indicators related to batting and bowling (Bhardwaj & Dwyer, 2022;Douglas & Tam, 2010;Irvine & Kennedy, 2017;Moore et al., 2012;Najdan et al., 2014;Petersen et al., 2008) or applied machine learning techniques to predict match outcomes (Basit et al., 2020;Dubey et al., 2020;Ishi & Patil, 2021;Kapadia et al., 2020;”
From Position-specific fielding instances and utilisation in professional men’s T20 cricket (2026) · cites this paper as Bhardwaj & Dwyer, 2022
Winning teams have been reported to score a higher number of total runs from boundaries.
“As winning teams have been reported to score a higher number of total runs from boundaries (Bhardwaj & Dwyer, 2022;Douglas & Tam, 2010;Irvine & Kennedy, 2017;Moore et al., 2012;C. Petersen et al., 2008)”
From Position-specific fielding instances and utilisation in professional men’s T20 cricket (2026) · cites this paper as Bhardwaj & Dwyer, 2022
Cites
Analysis of team performances at the ICC World Twenty20 Cup 2009
Douglas, M. J., & Tam, N. (2010) · International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport · doi:10.1080/24748668.2010.11868500 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Analysis of performance indicators that most significantly affect International Twenty20 cricket
Irvine, S., & Kennedy, R. (2017) · International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport · doi:10.1080/24748668.2017.1343989 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Position-specific fielding instances and utilisation in professional men’s T20 cricket
Lee, T. A., Novak, A. R., & Pickering Rodriguez, E. C. (2026) · International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport · doi:10.1080/24748668.2025.2492980 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“While previous performance analysis research in T20 cricket has examined performance indicators related to batting and bowling (Bhardwaj & Dwyer, 2022; Douglas & Tam, 2010; Irvine & Kennedy, 2017; Moore et al., 2012; Najdan et al., 2014; Petersen et al., 2008) or applied machine learning techniques…”
Jamil, M., Manthorpe, S., MacDonald, D., & Ez-Zizi, A. (2026) · International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport · doi:10.1080/24748668.2025.2455276 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Cricket is among the most popular and widely watched sports in the world with over 2 million followers globally (Bhardwaj & Dwyer, 2022).”
Mullick, P. (2025) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1080/01605682.2025.2476057
Bhardwaj, D., Feros, S. A., Luo, W., Hills, D., Kulshreshtha, R., Chaudhary, M., & Dwyer, D. B. (2026) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541261446089
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bhardwaj, D., & Dwyer, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Dwyer, Dan B
- Venue
- International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-03-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-290
- ISSN
- 1474-8185 (ISSN-L)
- 2474-8668
- OpenAlex
- W4214944388
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- associated with the work featured in this
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- T20 cricket, batting performance, bowling performance, women's cricket, match strategy, wickets, runs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review