Cited by 21Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyGut microbiota and healthInsect symbiosis and bacterial influences

The gut microbiota structure of the terrestrial isopod Porcellionides pruinosus (Isopoda: Oniscidea)

Open access
Delhoumi, M., Catania, V., Zaabar, W., Tolone, M., Quatrini, P., Achouri, M. S.·2020·The European Zoological Journal

Abstract

We used a combination of culture-dependent and independent approaches to study in depth the microbial community associated with the digestive tract of the terrestrial isopod Porcellionides pruinosus (Brandt, Citation1833). Specimens from different sampling sites in Tunisia harbored distinct microbiota profiles indicating the impact of both host origin and environmental factors on shaping the microbial flora within P. pruinosus. Our results revealed unexpected bacterial diversity especially via metagenomic analysis; a total of 819 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) assigned to two major bacterial phyla; Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. We used Nutrient Agar to isolate the cultivable fraction of bacteria associated with the gut of three geographically distant populations of P. pruinosus. The isolated bacteria belong to Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. Enrichment cultures on carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) medium gave evidence that the gut of this Oniscidea harbors cellulolytic Firmicutes and Proteobacteria probably involved in the lignocellulose degradation and then in mediating the functional role of terrestrial isopods as litter decomposers and regulators of nutrient cycling in soil ecosystems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/24750263.2020.1781269

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Delhoumi, M., Catania, V., Zaabar, W., Tolone, M., Quatrini, P., & Achouri, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Tunis University (TN)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
Corresponding author
Quatrini, P.
Venue
The European Zoological Journal
Published
2020-01
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
357-368
ISSN
  • 1125-0003 (ISSN-L)
  • 2475-0263
OpenAlex
W3043594921
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The European Zoological Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • IRIS UniPA (University of Palermo) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Tunis El Manar (Tunisia) and the University of Palermo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Keywords
gut microbiota, Porcellionides pruinosus, terrestrial isopods, digestive tract bacteria, bacterial diversity, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, lignocellulose degradation, litter decomposition, soil nutrient cycling, environmental factors, metagenomics, bacterial isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review