The Development of an Ecologically Valid Test for Assessing Patients with a Dysexecutive Syndrome
Abstract
(1998). The Development of an Ecologically Valid Test for Assessing Patients with a Dysexecutive Syndrome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: Vol. 8, Assessment of Attention and Executive Function. Guest Editor: J. Crawford, pp. 213-228.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The widely held assumption that tasks very close to real world situations will be psychometrically unsound has recently been shown not to be the case.
“But a further contributing problem has probably been the widely held assumption that tasks very close to real world situations will be psychometrically unsound. Recently, this has been shown not to be the case (e.g., Burgess et al., 1998; Knight et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 1998).”
From The case for the development and use of ecologically valid measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology (2006) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 1998
The BADS was developed to provide a more ecologically valid clinical tool for assessing executive functions.
“However, this measure was developed to provide a more ecologically valid clinical tool for assessing executive functions.”
From Practitioner Review: Do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct? (2013) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 1998
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 285
- Authors
- Wilson, B. A., Evans, J. J., Emslie, H., Alderman, N., & Burgess, P.
- Venue
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-228
- ISSN
- 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0694
- OpenAlex
- W2019763727
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- dysexecutive syndrome, executive function, ecologically valid assessment, test development, neuropsychological assessment, attention, executive dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
