The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avoiding Misinformation: Reinstating Target Modality
Abstract
Explanations of the misinformation effect were considered in an experiment using a reversed eyewitness suggestibility design (Lindsay & Johnson, 1989b). Forty-eight subjects read a narrative describing a photograph that they subsequently viewed. For half the subjects, the narrative contained misinformation. Recognition tests for objects appearing in the photograph were administered in either a verbal or a pictorial modality. A misinformation effect was found in the verbal condition, as found by Lindsay and Johnson. With pictorial probes there was no misinformation effect, indicating that reinstatement of the appropriate modality cues can eliminate the influence of misleading post-event information upon memory and permit the retrieval of the target memory. The experiment was conceived of and discussed within the headed records framework.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous research does provide some examples of the importance of considering the role of a separate perceptual memory system.”
From Episodic memory, perceptual memory, and their interaction: Foundations for a theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. (2014) · cites this paper as Abeles & Morton, 1999
In the citing paper
“However, if the test is pictorial rather than verbal, the effect is no longer present”
From Episodic memory, perceptual memory, and their interaction: Foundations for a theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. (2014) · cites this paper as Abeles & Morton, 1999
In the citing paper
“presumably because the test provides participants with improved access to their perceptual memory of the picture rather than their episodic memory of the narrative”
From Episodic memory, perceptual memory, and their interaction: Foundations for a theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. (2014) · cites this paper as Abeles & Morton, 1999
Citations
Cites
Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19 · Cited by 1,511
The reversed eyewitness suggestibility effect
Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03329912 · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.139 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.72 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.466 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03196983 · DOI
- Johnson M. K., Biological and Psychological Perspectives on Memory and Memory Disorders.
- 10.3758/BF03198473 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90023-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066X.35.5.409 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.114.1.1 · DOI
- Morton J., 1986, Advances in cognitive science 1., 43
- 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90002-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00701-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90006-9 · DOI
- Paivio A., 1971, Imagery and verbal processes
- 10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80027-7 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1983.0060 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brewin, C. R. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0033722 · Cited by 492
Metadata
- Authors
- Abeles, P., & Morton, J.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Psychiatry, London, U.K.
- University College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Morton, John
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 581-592
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W2029633391
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- misinformation effect, eyewitness memory, post-event information, eyewitness suggestibility, recognition memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
