Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scale-space theory: a basic tool for analyzing structures at different scales

Open access
Lindeberg, Tony·1994·Journal of Applied Statistics

Abstract

An inherent property of objects in the world is that they only exist as meaningful entities over certain ranges of scale. If one aims to describe the structure of unknown real-world signals, then a multi-scale representation of data is of crucial importance. This paper gives a tutorial review of a special type of multi-scale representation—linear scale-space representation—which has been developed by the computer vision community to handle image structures at different scales in a consistent manner. The basic idea is to embed the original signal into a one-parameter family of gradually smoothed signals in which the fine-scale details are successively suppressed. Under rather general conditions on the type of computations that are to be performed at the first stages of visual processing, in what can be termed ‘the visual front-end’, it can be shown that the Gaussian kernel and its derivatives are singled out as the only possible smoothing kernels. The conditions that specify the Gaussian kernel are, basically, linearity and shift invariance, combined with different ways of formalizing the notion that structures at coarse scales should correspond to simplifications of corresponding structures at fine scales-they should not be accidental phenomena created by the smoothing method. Notably, several different ways of choosing scale-space axioms give rise to the same conclusion. The output from the scale-space representation can be used for a variety of early visual tasks; operations such as feature detection, feature classification and shape computation can be expressed directly in terms of (possibly non-linear) combinations of Gaussian derivatives at multiple scales. In this sense the scale-space representation canserve as a basis for early vision. During the last few decades, a number of other approaches to multiscale representations have been developed, which are more or less related to scale-space theory, notably the theories of pyramids, wavelets and multi grid methods.Despite their qualitative differences, the increasing propularity of each of these approaches indicates that the crucial notion of scale is increasingly appreciated by the computer.vision community and by researchers in other related fields. An interesting similarity to biological vision is that the scale-space operators closely resemble receptive field profiles registered in neurophysiological studies of the mam- malian retina and visual cortex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/757582976

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. BIJL, P. (1991) Aspects of visual contrast detection, PhD Thesis, University of Utrecht.
  2. BLOM, J. (1992) Topological and geometrical aspects of image structure, PhD Thesis, University of Utrecht.
  3. Blostein D., Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Computer Vision, 444
  4. Bruce J. W., 1984, Curves and Singularities
  5. 10.1007/978-3-642-82940-6 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82940-6
  6. Florack, L. M. J. (1993) The syntactical structure of scalar images, PhD thesis, University of Utrecht.
  7. Florack L. M. J., 1991, Proceedings of 7th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, 338
  8. Florack L. M. J., 1992, Proceedings of NATO Workshop on Shape in Picture
  9. Grace J. H., 1965, Algebra of Invariants
  10. Hanson A. R., 1974, Technical Report
  11. 10.1007/BF01444162 · doi:10.1007/bf01444162
  12. Hummel R. A., Proceedings of Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 204
  13. Hummel R., 1987, Parallel Computer Vision, 187
  14. Johansen P., Proceedings of 8th Internnational Conference on Pattern Recognition, 215
  15. Johansen P., 1993, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, in press
  16. Karlin S., 1968, Total Positivity
  17. Knudsen , C. B. and Christensen , H. I. On methods for efficient pyramid generation. Aalborg. pp.28–39.
  18. Koenderink J. J., 1990, Solid Shape
  19. Lindeberg T., Proceedings of NATO Workshop on Shape in Picture, Driebergen, The Netherlands; see also TRITA/NA/P-92/26, Royal Institute of Technology
  20. Lindeberg T., The Netherlands; see also TRITA/ NA/P-92/26, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
  21. Lindeberg T., Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision, 416
  22. Lindeberg T., 1992, TRITA-NA-P9229
  23. Lindeberg T., Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Computer Vision, 683
  24. Marr D., 1982, Vision
  25. Myer Y., 1988, Ondolettes et Operateurs
  26. Mumford D., Proceedings of IEEE Computation Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  27. Pauwels E. L., 1994, Technical Report
  28. Ruskai W. B., 1992, Wavelets and Their Applications
  29. Salden A. H., 1992, Internal Report 3DCV, 91
  30. Salden A. H., 1992, Internal Report 3DCV, 91
  31. 10.1090/qam/15914 · doi:10.1090/qam/15914
  32. SchÖNberg I. J., 1950, ii. Variation-diminishing integral operators of the convolution type, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), 12, 97
  33. Schwartz L., 1950, Théorie des Distributions
  34. Spivak M., 1975, Differential Geometry, 1
  35. StrÖMberg J. O., 1983, Proceedings of Conference on Harmonic Analysis in Honor of Antoni Zygmund
  36. Tanimoto S., 1980, Structured Computer Vision
  37. 1989.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11
  38. Tikhonov A. N., 1977, Solution of Ill-posed Problems
  39. Uhr L., 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers, 759
  40. Weyl H., 1946, The Classical Groups, Their Invariants and Representations
  41. Whitaker R. T., 1993, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 57
  42. Widder D. V., 1975, The Heat Equation
  43. 10.1109/34.120332 · doi:10.1109/34.120332
  44. Witkin A. P., Proceedings of IEEE Computation Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1019
  45. Young R. A., 1985, The Gaussian derivative theory of spatial vision: analysis of cortical call receptive field line-weighting profiles, Technical Report GMR-4920
  46. Yuille A. L., 1988, Advances in Computer Vision (Lawrence Erlbaum), 47
  47. Yuille A. L., Proceedings of IEEE Computation Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 685

Cited by

See all 1,196

Metadata

Authors
Lindeberg, T.
Venue
Journal of Applied Statistics
Published
1994-01
Volume
21
Issue
1-2
Pages
225-270
ISSN
  • 0266-4763 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0532
OpenAlex
W2042243448
Cited by
1,196
References
83
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scale-space theory: a basic tool for analyzing structures at different scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/757582976
The paper
Lindeberg, T. (1994). Scale-space theory: a basic tool for analyzing structures at different scales. Journal of Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/757582976

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.