The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of the green revolution and prospects for the future
Abstract
This article evaluates the impact of the Green Revolution with regard to its impact on food production and production fluctuations, its direct impact on poverty and nutrition, and its indirect income and employment effects. It also considers the role of women in technological change and the environmental effects of the Green Revolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patel, R. (2013) · Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.719224 · Cited by 718
Tracing back to move ahead: a review of development pathways that constrain adaptation futures
Gajjar, S. P., Singh, C., & Deshpande, T. (2019) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2018.1442793 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinstrup‐Andersen, P., & Hazell, P. B. R.
- Venue
- Food Reviews International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 1525-6103 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2143570438
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of the green revolution and prospects for the future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/87559128509540765
- The paper
- Pinstrup‐Andersen, P., & Hazell, P. B. R. (1985). The impact of the green revolution and prospects for the future. Food Reviews International. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559128509540765
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
