Using Online Video to Support Student Learning and Engagement
Abstract
Online videos are used increasingly in higher education teaching as part of the explosion of Web 2.0 tools that are now available. YouTube is one popular example of a video-sharing resource that both faculty and students can use effectively, both inside and outside of the classroom, to engage students in their learning, energize classroom discussion, and meet course learning goals. The authors, integrating current literature with their own classroom experiences, describe different types of assignments for which online video can be effectively used.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integration of YouTube videos in learning supports students' engagement and enhances their participation in the classroom.
“The integration of YouTube videos in the learning process supports students' engagement and results in enhancing students' participation in the classroom (Sherer & Shea, 2011) and increasing students' achievement in learning (Jones & Cuthrell, 2011).”
From Teaching and Learning Science Using YouTube Videos and Discovery Learning in Primary School (2020) · cites this paper as Sherer & Shea, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chiu, T. K. F. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1926289 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Teaching and Learning Science Using YouTube Videos and Discovery Learning in Primary School
Koto, I. (2020) · Mimbar Sekolah Dasar · doi:10.17509/mimbar-sd.v7i1.22504 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sherer, P., & Shea, T.
- Affiliations
- Providence College (US)
- University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
- ORCID
- Shea, Timothy
- Venue
- College Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-04-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 56-59
- ISSN
- 1930-8299 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7555
- OpenAlex
- W2022523455
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 30.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- College Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Educational Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- online video, YouTube, student engagement, Web 2.0 tools, university teaching, video assignments, classroom discussion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
